If the Packers are only expected to get a 5th for J.C. Tretter, a guy who played 100% of the snaps and makes around $5.5M per year, I have hard time imagining Foles, with his 800 fewer snaps and $5.5M dollar salary, netting a larger comp pick. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
If the Packers are only expected to get a 5th for J.C. Tretter, a guy who played 100% of the snaps and makes around $5.5M per year, I have hard time imagining Foles, with his 800 fewer snaps and $5.5M dollar salary, netting a larger comp pick.
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
If the Packers are only expected to get a 5th for J.C. Tretter, a guy who played 100% of the snaps and makes around $5.5M per year, I have hard time imagining Foles, with his 800 fewer snaps and $5.5M dollar salary, netting a larger comp pick.
What would the Browns be without JC Tretter?
What would the Eagles be without Nick Foles? [Reply]
Originally Posted by New World Order:
What would the Browns be without JC Tretter?
What would the Eagles be without Nick Foles?
It's a formula, it doesn't care what position you play.
As far as I know it mostly cares about how many players a team signed/lost, how much $ those players signed for, and how many snaps they played. [Reply]
You have no idea exactly how the formula is weighted, you dingus. Some guy on twitter has no idea how to break down a method that escapes people that work for teams.
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
As far as I know it mostly cares about how many players a team signed/lost, how much $ those players signed for, and how many snaps they played.
You don't know dick and you clearly don't know how many snap Foles played in 7 games this season.