ChiefsPlanet Mobile
Page 16 of 52
« First < 61213141516 1718192026 > Last »
Washington DC and The Holy Land>Two LA Cops have been shot in cold blood
Hammock Parties 09:30 PM 09-12-2020
And it looks like they'll probably die.

The race war is here.

Update: One male deputy and one female deputy were ambushed as they sat in their patrol vehicle. Both sustained multiple gunshot wounds and are in critical condition. They are both currently undergoing surgery. The suspect is still at large.

— LA County Sheriffs (@LASDHQ) September 13, 2020


BREAKING: Two LASD Transit Security Bureau deputies have been shot at the Compton PAX station. I’m told by LASD that both were shot in the head by a male who got off a bus, then fled. Both hospitalized, Sheriff Villanueva at hospital now. @FOXLA

— Bill Melugin (@BillFOXLA) September 13, 2020


UPDATE: LASD sources tell me both deputies were in their vehicle when they were both shot in the head and that this was a “straight ambush”. LASD working on suspect info. @FOXLA

— Bill Melugin (@BillFOXLA) September 13, 2020


I have just been sent surveillance video of the shooting and can confirm it is 100% an ambush. Man slowly creeps up to the vehicle like he’s stalking it, fires shots through the window, then flees the scene. I will not post any of the video until given approval to do so. @FOXLA

— Bill Melugin (@BillFOXLA) September 13, 2020

[Reply]
patteeu 01:39 PM 09-13-2020
Originally Posted by Donger:
You are saying that federal help must be requested by, say, the governor of said state? I read that Bush 41 deployed federal assets to LA during the riots there at the request of the California governor.
The federal government can enforce federal law anywhere. But if you want them to put down riots that fall short of insurrection, that responsibility (and authority) lies with the states.
[Reply]
Easy 6 01:41 PM 09-13-2020
Originally Posted by Baby Lee:
I thought this turned into an NFL draft thread out of nowhere. . .
Heh, it might be even WORSE than Mel's
[Reply]
Donger 01:41 PM 09-13-2020
Originally Posted by patteeu:
The federal government can enforce federal law anywhere. But if you want them to put down riots that fall short of insurrection, that responsibility (and authority) lies with the states.
So this isn't applicable?

`Sec. 333. Interference with State and Federal law

`The President, by using the militia or the armed forces, or both, or by any other means, shall take such measures as he considers necessary to suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy, if it--

`(1) so hinders the execution of the laws of that State, and of the United States within the State, that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law, and the constituted authorities of that State are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that right, privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection; or

`(2) opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws.
In any situation covered by clause (1), the State shall be considered to have denied the equal protection of the laws secured by the Constitution.'.[6]
[Reply]
Just Passin' By 01:41 PM 09-13-2020
Originally Posted by Bowser:
Jettio has taken a troll sized shit all over this thread.
I understand that the mods may have to put up with the clowns, but I have no idea why people here insist on dealing with jettio and his ilk.
[Reply]
sully1983 01:43 PM 09-13-2020
Just horrible I still can't believe whats happening in this country. the Left is flat out insane
[Reply]
vailpass 01:45 PM 09-13-2020

[Reply]
patteeu 01:46 PM 09-13-2020
Originally Posted by Donger:
So this isn't applicable?

`Sec. 333. Interference with State and Federal law

`The President, by using the militia or the armed forces, or both, or by any other means, shall take such measures as he considers necessary to suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy, if it--

`(1) so hinders the execution of the laws of that State, and of the United States within the State, that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law, and the constituted authorities of that State are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that right, privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection; or

`(2) opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws.
In any situation covered by clause (1), the State shall be considered to have denied the equal protection of the laws secured by the Constitution.'.[6]
The President can always make the argument that an insurrection is taking place (over the objection of state authorities), but why would he do that at this point?
[Reply]
jettio 01:48 PM 09-13-2020
Originally Posted by Hammock Parties:
No one ever said this.

The racial element of this is completely on one side - those who started it.

Black people have been weaponized by BLM. While non-white cops are less likely to be victims, it doesn't take a genious to figure out which race they're more likely to attack.
Racial violence is wrong and anyone that participates in that or advocates for that should be punished.

I suppose your internet world exposes you to to worst stories. Maybe, you can consider that not everybody is as bad as the ones you go looking for on the internet.
[Reply]
Hammock Parties 01:50 PM 09-13-2020
Originally Posted by jettio:
Racial violence is wrong and anyone that participates in that or advocates for that should be punished.
Then why are you so against the guy trying to crack down on it?
[Reply]
vailpass 01:50 PM 09-13-2020
Originally Posted by jettio:
Racial violence is wrong and anyone that participates in that or advocates for that should be punished.

I suppose your internet world exposes you to to worst stories. Maybe, you can consider that not everybody is as bad as the ones you go looking for on the internet.
Dude just stop.
[Reply]
Donger 01:50 PM 09-13-2020
Originally Posted by patteeu:
The President can always make the argument that an insurrection is taking place (over the objection of state authorities), but why would he do that at this point?
The above isn't limited to insurrection, unless I'm reading it incorrectly. It includes "domestic violence, unlawful combination."
[Reply]
stevieray 01:51 PM 09-13-2020
Originally Posted by jettio:

I suppose your
pretty much sums it up.
[Reply]
Flying High D 01:51 PM 09-13-2020
Originally Posted by Baby Lee:
I thought this turned into an NFL draft thread out of nowhere. . .
Almost as fast as peaceful protesters went from screaming in law enforcements faces to shooting them in the heads.
[Reply]
Donger 01:51 PM 09-13-2020
Originally Posted by Hammock Parties:
Then why are you so against the guy trying to crack down on it?
Why are you so sure that Trump wants it cracked down?
[Reply]
Flying High D 01:54 PM 09-13-2020
Originally Posted by Donger:
Why are you so sure that Trump wants it cracked down?
As often as he calls out the worthless mayors and governors that allow the anarchy might be a clue on where he stands.
[Reply]
Page 16 of 52
« First < 61213141516 1718192026 > Last »
Up