Its tough to say if Raiders had a dynasty. 3 rings within 1 decade. I would prob say yes.

Denver on the otherhand, hell no!
[Reply]

3 in 5 years is the established criteria
[Reply]

Dynasty discussion starts when you win 3 titles with the same core group, whether it is 5 years or a little more. Shows the team is consistently dominant. Cowboys were a short lived dynasty as they fell quick.

Steelers of the 70s and the Patriots run with Brady are the two strongest runs, with KC now nipping at their heels.
[Reply]

Q Joe thinks Denver is in a dynasty right now. I think his criteria is beating the Chiefs at least once in a 17 game span and averaging 5+ wins per season.
[Reply]

Yep.
[Reply]

Well said. I believe the Pats had two separate dynasties. I’ve seen their fans try and combine them.
[Reply]

Always a blessing... :-)
[Reply]

Imagine building your QB room with this… :-)


[Reply]

:-)
[Reply]

Denver's total wins this season is at 5.5 :-). That's tied for second fewest.

Knowmo, any thoughts?
[Reply]

They couldn't lead a turnip let alone grown men
[Reply]