Originally Posted by okiedokieokoye:
If we're going with a Center as our first pick, I surely think we could trade out of the first round, score an extra pick and still take a starting Center. This class is loaded.
idk, there seems to be a consensus that its Ruiz then everyone else. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Dunerdr:
idk, there seems to be a consensus that its Ruiz then everyone else.
Ruiz is consistently graded as a first round pick and is probably the safe pick at center... but I’ve seen quite a few people who have a Cushenberry ahead of Ruiz. Flip side, I’ve also seen people who have Cushenberry as a 2nd or 3rd round pick and a clear tier below Ruiz. Will be interesting to see where he falls - I personally like Cushenberry better. Trading down 10-15 spots, taking Cush, and picking up a few extra picks is one scenario I’d be okay with. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Kellerfox:
Ruiz is consistently graded as a first round pick and is probably the safe pick at center... but I’ve seen quite a few people who have a Cushenberry ahead of Ruiz. Flip side, I’ve also seen people who have Cushenberry as a 2nd or 3rd round pick and a clear tier below Ruiz. Will be interesting to see where he falls - I personally like Cushenberry better. Trading down 10-15 spots, taking Cush, and picking up a few extra picks is one scenario I’d be okay with.
Personally id like that idea a lot. The top 100 seems solid so more picks on a team thats gonna be paying some stars is always good. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Kellerfox:
Ruiz is consistently graded as a first round pick and is probably the safe pick at center... but I’ve seen quite a few people who have a Cushenberry ahead of Ruiz. Flip side, I’ve also seen people who have Cushenberry as a 2nd or 3rd round pick and a clear tier below Ruiz. Will be interesting to see where he falls - I personally like Cushenberry better. Trading down 10-15 spots, taking Cush, and picking up a few extra picks is one scenario I’d be okay with.
I don't know about that consistently part. [Reply]
Originally Posted by The Franchise:
Yes to Dantzler. No to Swift.
I watched Simms' 'top 5 RB's in the draft' on youtube.
He had Swift at #5.
I don't necessarily agree with his whole 5, and there are some guys I like better than some of his top 5, but I do tend to agree that Swift is overrated. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Chief Northman:
Kiper released 4.0 today
Chiefs:
#32 - D’Andre Swift RB
#64 - Cameron Dantzler CB
If we could get Logan Wilson or maybe Davis-Gaither in the 3rd, this wouldn't be bad. Kind of high for a RB though, just because this draft is pretty loaded there.
I'd rather - in order - get either Murray or Queen, or Ruiz, or the top CB left on my board at #32. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Chris Meck:
I watched Simms' 'top 5 RB's in the draft' on youtube.
He had Swift at #5.
I don't necessarily agree with his whole 5, and there are some guys I like better than some of his top 5, but I do tend to agree that Swift is overrated.
Chris Simms also has Jerry Jeudy outside of his top 5 WR’s.
I think Chris Simms is pretty useless when it comes to the draft. [Reply]