Originally Posted by Pasta Little Brioni:
Giving billionaires money they don't need to build a stadium in an unsafe cesspool or lose the team? Great options....
You have to give them the money or you don't love KC. Jackson County will re-elect Mayor Q and Frank White too. They've never said no to a grifter. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Bearcat:
At least Arrowhead will always be in the safe, glamorous part of the city.
Nothing lights my pants on fire like going to Raytown and having a good bowl of Dixons diarheaa in a bowl and then I head off to Arrowhead where before and after the games I can watch people speed by on I70. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Pablo:
I wish this was a vote to give the Clarks anything they want. They deserve it.
Instead it's tied into a loser franchise that's given the city like 3 seasons of happiness in 40 years.
The loser Royals will have a new stadium before KC with some of the highest crime rates in the nation will have a jail. Speaks volumes about the rubes who live in this crime ridden shithole [Reply]
Originally Posted by HonestChieffan:
Soon as he gets new stadium he will sell it and cash big
Of course. He knows he's holding onto a walmart bag full of dogshit. Shove that dogshit into a Louis Vitton purse and laugh all the way to the bank. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Pablo:
Of course. He knows he's holding onto a walmart bag full of dogshit. Shove that dogshit into a Louis Vitton purse and laugh all the way to the bank.
If you take a look at Shermans personal worth, a metric shit ton of it is tied to the Royals, every bit of this speaks to a buy the team, get a stadium, sell it for double what he paid for it to bump up his wealth significantly. [Reply]
I’m not a Jackson County resident so this isn’t my fight.
But it does make me cringe when I see people online say dumb shit like “Vote No. Stay at the K.”
Like people understand that’s not an option right? The Royals will either get a new ballpark here or they will get it elsewhere.
This vote is basically, “Vote yes to have Major League Baseball in Kansas City. Vote no to get rid of it.”
Which, if people don’t want baseball here and are fine with losing the Royals then more power to them. I just hope everyone understands exactly what the stakes are.
Yeah it sucks to have to subsidize billionaires, but we don’t live in “Shouldland” we live in “Reality World” where unfortunately that’s the cost of having pro sports teams.
Losing pro sports would be incredibly costly to KC and the region and I think there is more value in being a pro sports city than the anti “sportsball” crowd would ever admit.
Think of how much money and name recognition and prestige the Chiefs have brought to KC in the last decade. It’s enormous and that’s something that’s hard to put a price on.
If I lived there, this would be an easy yes. But again, easy to say when it’s not my money. [Reply]
Originally Posted by comochiefsfan:
I’m not a Jackson County resident so this isn’t my fight.
But it does make me cringe when I see people online say dumb shit like “Vote No. Stay at the K.”
Like people understand that’s not an option right? The Royals will either get a new ballpark here or they will get it elsewhere.
This vote is basically, “Vote yes to have Major League Baseball in Kansas City. Vote no to get rid of it.”
Which, if people don’t want baseball here and are fine with losing the Royals then more power to them. I just hope everyone understands exactly what the stakes are.
Yeah it sucks to have to subsidize billionaires, but we don’t live in “Shouldland” we live in “Reality World” where unfortunately that’s the cost of having pro sports teams.
Losing pro sports would be incredibly costly to KC and the region and I think there is more value in being a pro sports city than the anti “sportsball” crowd would ever admit.
Think of how much money and name recognition and prestige the Chiefs have brought to KC in the last decade. It’s enormous and that’s something that’s hard to put a price on.
If I lived there, this would be an easy yes. But again, easy to say when it’s not my money.
I think people do completely forget how fucking old those stadiums are, Royals stadium is only behind Wrigley and Fenway for oldest stadium in the league, it is not a historical momument like those. [Reply]
Originally Posted by comochiefsfan:
I’m not a Jackson County resident so this isn’t my fight.
But it does make me cringe when I see people online say dumb shit like “Vote No. Stay at the K.”
Like people understand that’s not an option right? The Royals will either get a new ballpark here or they will get it elsewhere.
This vote is basically, “Vote yes to have Major League Baseball in Kansas City. Vote no to get rid of it.”
Which, if people don’t want baseball here and are fine with losing the Royals then more power to them. I just hope everyone understands exactly what the stakes are.
Yeah it sucks to have to subsidize billionaires, but we don’t live in “Shouldland” we live in “Reality World” where unfortunately that’s the cost of having pro sports teams.
Losing pro sports would be incredibly costly to KC and the region and I think there is more value in being a pro sports city than the anti “sportsball” crowd would ever admit.
Think of how much money and name recognition and prestige the Chiefs have brought to KC in the last decade. It’s enormous and that’s something that’s hard to put a price on.
If I lived there, this would be an easy yes. But again, easy to say when it’s not my money.
Some folks don't give a spit about sports but are tired of constantly being taxed for rich benefit and hobby I like sports and I don't live in Jackson County. So it's their business I suppose.
I do believe that everything they pour money into downtown KC fails. There is a history in it. I think there is more danger in losing the Royals because of Sherman. I think its all about making money not love of baseball in KC. He will sell it all for a huge profit. Thats how shysters work the system. [Reply]