guys, it's less about THE BACK and more about Reid's style of offensive line play. They move, they trap, they pull, they're athletic, and it's complicated.
Just like the rest of his offense.
The one downside to it is that we're not very good in situations where they need to just man up and maul the guy in front of them. [Reply]
LeSean McCoy limping into Arrowhead. He’s considered a game time decision (ankle). He wasn’t moving too good honestly. He also didn’t know where to go. It’s his first time playing here as a Chief. pic.twitter.com/MGMo5RAv6O
LeSean McCoy limping into Arrowhead. He’s considered a game time decision (ankle). He wasn’t moving too good honestly. He also didn’t know where to go. It’s his first time playing here as a Chief. pic.twitter.com/MGMo5RAv6O
LeSean McCoy limping into Arrowhead. He’s considered a game time decision (ankle). He wasn’t moving too good honestly. He also didn’t know where to go. It’s his first time playing here as a Chief. pic.twitter.com/MGMo5RAv6O
Originally Posted by petegz28:
He was looking a little soft there..no need playing him on a shit field today
That's what I was thinking. No need to play him on a bad ankle when the field is going to be a swamp. Players play on sprained ankles all the time and I don't really think he would injure it worse. I just don't think he's going to be very effective, because the combination of a bum ankle and mud will really slow him down. It's time to see what Darwin can do. It's not like we need a run game anyways. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Chris Meck:
guys, it's less about THE BACK and more about Reid's style of offensive line play. They move, they trap, they pull, they're athletic, and it's complicated.
Just like the rest of his offense.
The one downside to it is that we're not very good in situations where they need to just man up and maul the guy in front of them.
Agree 1000%. And, the Chiefs have had no problems with 3rd and 1, 4th and 1 situations the last couple of years anyway, you don't need to waste a roster spot on a "Bruiser back". [Reply]
