Former #Browns GM John Dorsey says Myles Garrett told him right away Mason Rudolph used a racial slur.
In ESPN interview, Garrett says he told Dorsey, coaches and DT Larry Ogunjobi about accusation on heels of Nov. 14 fight. Ogunjobi confirmed on Dec. 1.https://t.co/2EFrtzo4JO
Originally Posted by staylor26:
Dude, this is such a bad ****ing take.
If you’re even remotely famous and somebody lies and accuses you of racism, you have ever right to and should sue.
Garrett is going to make a hell of a lot more money than Rudolph will. There’s no reason why Rudolph should just let that go. Why should Garrett get away with a lie that could ruin your life in today’s climate? Are you ****ing kidding me with this shit?
He said that Mason called him "A stupid N-word". You don't know it's a lie, you're choosing to believe who you want to believe. We get it, you're on Mason's side and believe that Myles should have to pay him for all his pain and suffering he's caused, but claiming a white guy said the N word is not worthy of a lawsuit in my mind.
If Myles called him a racist, then that's an attack on his character, but if Myles said that Mason said the N word to him, that's different. It's then on everyone else to interpret that, some interpret, like you, that he didn't say it, it's not possible. Others interpret it, and the media takes it and flies with it, and says that Garrett is calling Rudolph a racist. No he didn't, Myles said Rudolph said the N word to him, he didn't say Mason is a racist, he has it out for black people, he said "He called me a stupid N word." Listen to me carefully, YOU CAN'T PROVE IT DID HAPPEN OR THAT IT DIDN'T HAPPEN, which is why it would be thrown out in court. He could get him for the assault, sure, but the racial slur isn't going to work out like you think. I'm not kidding you with this shit, it's an accurate take, just because you disagree with it doesn't make it a bad take. Get over yourself, not everyone thinks like you do. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Eleazar:
Garrett knows just what to say to excuse his inexcusable behavior in the minds of some. Interesting.
What's weird is, I was actually making excuses for him after the game. On Twitter and everything, with plenty of people I know I'm sure judging me to be a dickhead. I felt like Rudolph kinda started it by ripping at Garrett's helmet first. Not saying it was okay, but I felt like it should be a suspension of only a few games, and was really annoyed at all of the people crying out for a lifetime ban, etc. It's football and sometime shit gets out of hand. I was rooting for cooler heads to prevail.
But falsely accusing somebody of using the n-word is beyond the pale. And all evidence points to that being exactly what Garrett did. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Gravedigger:
He said that Mason called him "A stupid N-word". You don't know it's a lie, you're choosing to believe who you want to believe. We get it, you're on Mason's side and believe that Myles should have to pay him for all his pain and suffering he's caused, but claiming a white guy said the N word is not worthy of a lawsuit in my mind.
If Myles called him a racist, then that's an attack on his character, but if Myles said that Mason said the N word to him, that's different. It's then on everyone else to interpret that, some interpret, like you, that he didn't say it, it's not possible. Others interpret it, and the media takes it and flies with it, and says that Garrett is calling Rudolph a racist. No he didn't, Myles said Rudolph said the N word to him, he didn't say Mason is a racist, he has it out for black people, he said "He called me a stupid N word." Listen to me carefully, YOU CAN'T PROVE IT DID HAPPEN OR THAT IT DIDN'T HAPPEN, which is why it would be thrown out in court. He could get him for the assault, sure, but the racial slur isn't going to work out like you think. I'm not kidding you with this shit, it's an accurate take, just because you disagree with it doesn't make it a bad take. Get over yourself, not everyone thinks like you do.
I’m not claiming to know whether he’s guilty or not. I don’t believe he is for several reasons, but I’m not claiming to know for sure.
But he does. And you’re saying that he shouldn’t sue even if Garrett is lying, and him suing somehow proves his guilt. That’s what I disagree with. It’s ridiculous. [Reply]
Originally Posted by TripleThreat:
Can you really blame Myles? He's younger than me and I'm not even in my 30's yet.
I blame our media particularly our liberal media, teaching our youth to use racism as a weapon. This is the perfect example of how young black people are being taught to use the "I'm being targeted because I'm black" when there is no evidence to suggest it, and since the entire country is so sensitive towards anything racism related, the media clings and leeches to it and runs with it as fact regardless of how much merit the story holds.
“I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.” - Martin Luther King Jr.
I wish Martin Luther King Jr. was still alive, just so he could tell this damn country we are moving in the wrong direction, and his movement and everything he died for is slowly being forgotten because we are being told to see eachother as black,white,hispanic,asian etc, rather than seeing and judging eachother off of our values and our character as human-being's.
Originally Posted by SAUTO:
definitely, thats why he takes up for proven racists all the time. :-)
He tries to hide it but it's just too much work. If he only had a couple of posts then id sweep it under the rug, but goddamn, there is just too much evidence to ignore. Im going to compile all of this evidence during my morning shit tomorrow and post it. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Gravedigger:
claiming a white guy said the N word is not worthy of a lawsuit in my mind.
That's a fairly broad sentiment. And in keeping with the times [thinking of Smollett and the prosecution AND defense of his actions,' I propose that there should be a sense of action/fraud parity.
That is, you are entitled to say that a fraudulent accusation isn't that big of a deal. But in doing so, you forfeit the right to advocate that an actual analogous accusion IS a big deal.
And vice-versa, if you are an advocate against legitimate bigoted social interactions, even on a personal level, you need to pledge to advocate just as passionately against fraudulent scenarios. [Reply]
Originally Posted by PAChiefsGuy:
Man **** you... Everyone here knows you are pompous asshole who thinks he is so much smarter than everyone else.
Guess what Rudolph suing doesn't mean shit... You've been acting like he didn't say anything when you don't know for sure.
I’d rather be known as a “pompous asshole” than one of the dumbest motherfukers on here.
And you clearly STILL don’t get my point. I’ve already acknowledged that I don’t know for sure what was said or not said. I never said him suing means anything either. I said it’s not proof that he’s lying. READ. [Reply]
Originally Posted by staylor26:
I’d rather be known as a “pompous asshole” than one of the dumbest motherfukers on here.
And you clearly STILL don’t get my point. I’ve already acknowledged that I don’t know for sure what was said or not said. I never said him suing means anything either. I said it’s not proof that he’s lying. READ.
I've read your posts. You flip flop pretty much any chance you can get. You're a fucking joke. [Reply]
You know that I can think Garrett is lying without knowing for sure, right? That’s not flip fopping diphshit, it’s knowing the difference between an opinion and a fact. [Reply]
