Originally Posted by Rain Man:
They just said that a Chief is ranked in the 50s, which is far too low. I don't know who it is yet.
Well, we know that Pat is in the top-5, Kelce and Hill both will be in the top-20, so who's left? Jones? Probably top 25? Matthieu? Top 30 at least. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Rain Man:
#62 is David Bakhtiari. He's the highest-ranked tackle, so Super Bowl champions Schwartz, Fisher, and Erving got screwed.
Kind of crazy the difference between how teams value tackles and these rankings. [Reply]
Originally Posted by ChiliConCarnage:
Kind of crazy the difference between how teams value tackles and these rankings.
I have a theory that there's an inherent problem in their voting system. Players are going to identify guys that they go up against. DBs will disproportionately identify WRs and QBs, QBs will identify pass rushers and CBs, etc. I think some positions like the Oline and interior defensive positions will get fewer votes just because they interact with fewer opponents play after play. [Reply]
I can no longer imagine going into the playoffs with a Kirk Cousins or Ryan Tannehill and hoping that he has a career day so you can get to the next game, since that's what it's going to take. [Reply]