Originally Posted by BigBeauford:
Since it has been legally determined, by themselves no less, that Tucker Carlson's show cannot be taken as a factually accurate show, this analogy hilariously raises many more questions than answers.
The point is, the sky either is or isn't blue. It doesn't depend on who tells you. [Reply]
So we're clear, on taxes of someone you don't like, the IRS needs it's work checked and rechecked, because there is no end to the verification, examination, and analysis. Our credibility as a republic is just too dear.
And on the legitimacy of elections, procedural dismissals, all the way to the SC with no examination of the merits is merited on the sacred principle of shut your fucking mouth.
Originally Posted by Baby Lee:
So we're clear, on taxes of someone you don't like, the IRS needs it's work checked and rechecked, because there is no end to the verification, examination, and analysis. Our credibility as a republic is just too dear.
And on the legitimacy of elections, procedural dismissals, all the way to the SC with no examination of the merits is merited on the sacred principle of shut your fucking mouth.
Got it.
Don't got it.
1) This isn't an IRS review of whether Trump paid his taxes.
2) There were cases decided on the merits. Most weren't because of the relative incompetence of the attorneys involved, but some were. Which case is it that you think makes the best case that there was genuine election fraud of a scope to overturn a state. Go ahead and pick the best case of the 60+ they lost to discuss. [Reply]
Originally Posted by cosmo20002:
I don't recall it exactly. There was something about grades, babbly insinuated that we don't know Obama's, so I mentioned that we do know he graduated with honors. Then you popped in with net worth.
Super rich but can't see his taxes.
Super smart but can't see his grades.
You tend to be confused when you don’t read the exchanges. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Baby Lee:
So we're clear, on taxes of someone you don't like, the IRS needs it's work checked and rechecked, because there is no end to the verification, examination, and analysis. Our credibility as a republic is just too dear.
And on the legitimacy of elections, procedural dismissals, all the way to the SC with no examination of the merits is merited on the sacred principle of shut your ****ing mouth.
Originally Posted by Baby Lee: So we're clear, on taxes of someone you don't like, the IRS needs it's work checked and rechecked, because there is no end to the verification, examination, and analysis. Our credibility as a republic is just too dear.
And on the legitimacy of elections, procedural dismissals, all the way to the SC with no examination of the merits is merited on the sacred principle of shut your ****ing mouth.
Got it.
So we're clear, the Supreme Court (and common sense) says you're a dishonest and pretentious drama queen twat. [Reply]
Originally Posted by cosmo20002:
I get confused when you start in with the gibberish.
We saw Obama's taxes and didn't see Trump's (despite his promises).