It’s not just there. 5% of my bonus is dependent on minorities and women being promoted/hired into senior leadership. I’m middle management. So essentially, this is what they’re telling me.
1. You’re not getting promoted
2. Here’s a little bribe so you hopefully complain less about it. [Reply]
Originally Posted by AndChiefs:
It’s not just there. 5% of my bonus is dependent on minorities and women being promoted/hired into senior leadership. I’m middle management. So essentially, this is what they’re telling me.
1. You’re not getting promoted
2. Here’s a little bribe so you hopefully complain less about it.
But that is not racist or sexist.
We had our union rep try to put into our contract that preference would be given to the hiring, retention, placement and seniority of teachers of color.
Luckily it did not pass. I told him that the amendment was racist. And if the school wanted a lawsuit....someone would bring it if they were passed over on tenure because of color.
He also heard from a lot of others. It died in committee. [Reply]
Originally Posted by displacedinMN:
But that is not racist or sexist.
We had our union rep try to put into our contract that preference would be given to the hiring, retention, placement and seniority of teachers of color.
Luckily it did not pass. I told him that the amendment was racist. And if the school wanted a lawsuit....someone would bring it if they were passed over on tenure because of color.
He also heard from a lot of others. It died in committee.
Originally Posted by displacedinMN:
But that is not racist or sexist.
We had our union rep try to put into our contract that preference would be given to the hiring, retention, placement and seniority of teachers of color.
Luckily it did not pass. I told him that the amendment was racist. And if the school wanted a lawsuit....someone would bring it if they were passed over on tenure because of color.
He also heard from a lot of others. It died in committee.
First of all - I HATE teachers unions. That being stated - That "rep" would have been voted out immediately. [Reply]
Originally Posted by AndChiefs:
It’s not just there. 5% of my bonus is dependent on minorities and women being promoted/hired into senior leadership. I’m middle management. So essentially, this is what they’re telling me.
1. You’re not getting promoted
2. Here’s a little bribe so you hopefully complain less about it.
White people apparently support this. Or else it wouldn’t keep happening everywhere. [Reply]
Originally Posted by tyecopeland:
Pretty sure that was a thing. I mean even the nba had a policy in place not too long ago that pretty much told the players to be less black for their press conferences.
The problem is this attempted transposition of behaviors that trend towards professional or unprofessional or trend toward productive or unproductive, into inherently black or white.
It's that conflation of black and blackNESS, or white and whiteNESS, going on everywhere.
If you have a criticism of NBA standards, cite the standard and explain the problem, don't handwave it as 'forcing them to be less black.'
Black isn't a behavior, it's an irrelevant trait.
Your stance is like asserting that women have a right to 'act blonde.' Or that 'short person rage' is a culture. [Reply]
Originally Posted by jdubya:
Here in Ca they tried this crap already and it was called “Affirmative Action”. It failed miserably and even Californians said enough
Oh hell, the military has had that for years. I personally saw several members from Enlisted to Officers (white) passed over for promotion by black members who, quite honestly (in an least some of the cases) had no business whatsoever being promoted - but were.
I suppose that in some instances I guess it didn't hurt morale that much. However, in other instances, those being "promoted" over more highly qualified personnel may have indeed, put soldiers lives at risk.
Damned shame, but "politics is politics" - George Patton [Reply]