I'll take the grizz. Teeth and claws, plus grizzlies kill for a living, gorillas don't. Not saying gorillas don't kill, but only in specific situations so not that often, while grizzlies pretty much have to kill on a regular basis to eat. [Reply]
Originally Posted by ThrobProng:
If both animals are 100% motivated to fight, the gorilla destroys the bear.
Please explain this logic. The bear is bigger, heavier, sharp claws, a better set of teeth for killing, and the bear is naturally more ferocious. I don't see any way the gorilla is not absolutely destroyed by the bear in pretty short order. [Reply]
Originally Posted by IowaHawkeyeChief:
Grizzly would make quick work of the gorilla, their claws would slice through a gorilla like a hot knife through butter...
Is the gorilla trained to use a gun? That's the only way the gorilla can pull this off. The grizzly has a massive size advantage and a massive claw advantage. [Reply]
I’m taking the gorilla. I think the gorilla is more agile, able to grab with its hands, and could evade the bear enough to wear it down some. But I could be wrong. The bear is more of a straight line animal, and like my Dane, it’s gonna take a second for it to get its ass around. (My smaller dog loves to get Tarzan into tight spaces when they’re playing cuz he can get around him and be attacking him again before he gets spun around) [Reply]
Originally Posted by LoneWolf:
Please explain this logic. The bear is bigger, heavier, sharp claws, a better set of teeth for killing, and the bear is naturally more ferocious. I don't see any way the gorilla is not absolutely destroyed by the bear in pretty short order.
Yeah, unless the gorilla gets into a tussle with King Kong, the grizzly wins and the gorilla takes a dirt nap. [Reply]
