Originally Posted by carcosa:
The fact that they've known each other for so long should clue people in to why she might take a while to come forward. Anyone here think they'd be quick to sue a close friend for anything, much less something as personal and invasive as rape? The emotions have to be incredibly complicated.
Who would’ve thought there’d be a long thread about ejaculating on a woman’s back and it wouldn’t even elicit the usual “CUMMING!” from you?
When things get serious, Carcosa goes all Will-Ferrel-vs-James-Carville. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Iowanian:
The University which allegedly educated AB has definitely committed a crime against th English language. He and the university are guilty of all charges.
Dont know if he rsped her but he admited to sexual assault by whacking on her back while she slept. He superman'd that ho.
Definitely a scumbag human.
At no point in those texts did he admit to doing so, just FWIW. I know they're a travesty of English and hard to understand, so let me try to explain.
First, there's the district possibility that the first several statements are in response to something, and he is mocking that accusation. As these are provided without context, we could be looking at a "I shot the clerk" situation from My Cousin Vinnie. This is supported by the statement "f your knowledge", along with indications she had slept on the couch.
The statements could be in reply to a text from her claiming he had done those things, in fact I would expect that to be the case, and if so it would actually be a denial he had (done something on her back) at all. This is further reinforced when he seemed to indicate later that his people would laugh about the idea that he had done so, that the accusation is, in fact, laughable.
The other thing to keep in mind, if you don't believe the above to be true, is that he makes no indication that she was asleep while he did anything at all. Even if you take his statements as declarative, the statement about doing things on her back and her sleeping in his bed are one of the few things that are actually separate. If it is declarative, it could be in response to claims he (did something) inside of her rather than on her back and she feared she might be pregnant. In which case the beginning would seem to read "that's impossible, I didn't even *** inside you, and if it was non consensual and so traumatic why were you sleeping in my bed afterwards".
As this being declarative would seem to contradict the assertion she slept on his couch I think the former more likely, but regardless, the two key things to keep in mind are 1) we really need the texts preceding this to have context and understand what this jibberish means, and 2) these do not in and of themselves contain an admission of any wrongdoing of any kind. [Reply]
Originally Posted by rabblerouser:
No, but I was...to the mother of my child, whom I refer to as "my ex-wife" or "baby momma", in the parlance of our times.
You refer to your child as your ex-wife???? [Reply]
Don't believe this cash grab. Also that stuff he wrote doesn't mean shit. He literally didn't say anything that should get him in trouble. Sure we will have the SJWs and Mac N Cheese talk about how he's a disgrace and blah blah blah, but if he really didn't rape her (3 fucking times give me a god damn break) she should be in trouble. One of these money grabbing bitches needs to beade into an example and spend some time in jail. [Reply]
Originally Posted by :
In the complaint Taylor alleges: Brown exposed himself and forcibly kissed her; on a separate occasion he ejaculated on her back, without her knowledge, while they watched a church service; on a third occasion he raped her
Originally Posted by TwistedChief:
Who would’ve thought there’d be a long thread about ejaculating on a woman’s back and it wouldn’t even elicit the usual “CUMMING!” from you?
When things get serious, Carcosa goes all Will-Ferrel-vs-James-Carville.
Originally Posted by carcosa:
If she's really only seeking 75k, the cash grab accusations go out the window. That's definitely not worth the trouble if you're just in it for the money. That's someone seeking justice and using civil court to try and get it.
Originally Posted by Giant Octopodes:
At no point in those texts did he admit to doing so, just FWIW. I know they're a travesty of English and hard to understand, so let me try to explain.
First, there's the district possibility that the first several statements are in response to something, and he is mocking that accusation. As these are provided without context, we could be looking at a "I shot the clerk" situation from My Cousin Vinnie. This is supported by the statement "f your knowledge", along with indications she had slept on the couch.
The statements could be in reply to a text from her claiming he had done those things, in fact I would expect that to be the case, and if so it would actually be a denial he had (done something on her back) at all. This is further reinforced when he seemed to indicate later that his people would laugh about the idea that he had done so, that the accusation is, in fact, laughable.
The other thing to keep in mind, if you don't believe the above to be true, is that he makes no indication that she was asleep while he did anything at all. Even if you take his statements as declarative, the statement about doing things on her back and her sleeping in his bed are one of the few things that are actually separate. If it is declarative, it could be in response to claims he (did something) inside of her rather than on her back and she feared she might be pregnant. In which case the beginning would seem to read "that's impossible, I didn't even *** inside you, and if it was non consensual and so traumatic why were you sleeping in my bed afterwards".
As this being declarative would seem to contradict the assertion she slept on his couch I think the former more likely, but regardless, the two key things to keep in mind are 1) we really need the texts preceding this to have context and understand what this jibberish means, and 2) these do not in and of themselves contain an admission of any wrongdoing of any kind.
