Originally Posted by keg in kc:
I'm not sure why we think releasing Pringle has anything to do with Hill's status. It's just a straight swap with DAT coming of suspension.
Dat's coming back, therefore we release Pringle, another WR. We need to make a decision on Hill going to IR by Saturday, I believe. Do you think they would cut a WR if they were going to put Hill on IR, maybe, and cut another position, but having only 4 wideouts would be taking a risk. [Reply]
Originally Posted by IowaHawkeyeChief:
Dat's coming back, therefore we release Pringle, another WR. We need to make a decision on Hill going to IR by Saturday, I believe. Do you think they would cut a WR if they were going to put Hill on IR, maybe, and cut another position, but having only 4 wideouts would be taking a risk.
Originally Posted by arrowheadnation:
It's just opening up a spot for DAT.
That be as it may, we were going to do this even if Tyreek didn't go down. But we are -2 WR now instead of just -1 as expected. Perhaps there is a corresponding move or another WR we are looking at somewhere. [Reply]
Originally Posted by keg in kc:
I'm not sure why we think releasing Pringle has anything to do with Hill's status. It's just a straight swap with DAT coming of suspension.
Because if they thought Hill would be out more than a month, they would IR him with the return designation and keep both DAT and Pringle? [Reply]