Originally Posted by Chris Meck:
yeah I don't get the system fit thing for Stafford.
The only offense he wouldn't fit is Baltimore's. And if he went there, they just wouldn't do that shit anymore.
Agree. Problem really is that BAL simply doesn't have the right group of weapons. They're built to run the ball, and are pretty thin at WR. Maybe they can fix that in a minimum amount of time with the draft and a good offseason trade or pick up, but as they are constructed they aren't a very good fit for Stafford right now. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Megatron96:
Agree. Problem really is that BAL simply doesn't have the right group of weapons. They're built to run the ball, and are pretty thin at WR. Maybe they can fix that in a minimum amount of time with the draft and a good offseason trade or pick up, but as they are constructed they aren't a very good fit for Stafford right now.
yeah I don't think they're done with the Lamar experiment anyway.
My main point is that Stafford can play in any system in the NFL. He's great. [Reply]
Originally Posted by -King-:
If they let him get any input on where he's going, I bet he goes to Washington, Indy or SF even though he doesn't exactly match SFs system. Doubt the raiders would even want to trade for him and he wouldn't want to go to Denver.
Why would he want to go to Washington? I don't get it. That team has been a dumpster fire for decades now. I would think he'd had enough of that.
Indy or SF I can see. New England. Vegas. Chicago even. NOT CHICAGO I KNOW DAMN. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Chris Meck:
Why would he want to go to Washington? I don't get it. That team has been a dumpster fire for decades now. I would think he'd had enough of that.
Indy or SF I can see. New England. Vegas. Chicago even.
They have a great defense and an ok offense that's missing a Qb. They already have a good #1 receiver so if you put Stafford there, they should be really good and be the clear favorites to win their division again. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Chris Meck:
Why would he want to go to Washington? I don't get it. That team has been a dumpster fire for decades now. I would think he'd had enough of that.
Indy or SF I can see. New England. Vegas. Chicago even.
They're not gonna trade him in the division. Indy makes a ton of sense as does NO if Brees is done-though they might just keep Jamesis. I can see SF too and the Cheaters are always in play. [Reply]
Originally Posted by mkp785:
They're not gonna trade him in the division. Indy makes a ton of sense as does NO if Brees is done-though they might just keep Jamesis. I can see SF too and the Cheaters are always in play.
New Orleans makes 0 sense as they are in cap hell. [Reply]
Originally Posted by -King-:
If they let him get any input on where he's going, I bet he goes to Washington, Indy or SF even though he doesn't exactly match SFs system. Doubt the raiders would even want to trade for him and he wouldn't want to go to Denver.
I think if the Raiders had a deal in place to trade Carr, they'd absolutely be in on him. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Oxford:
I think if the Raiders had a deal in place to trade Carr, they'd absolutely be in on him.
Given the number of QB's available and rookies coming in, I doubt anyone would give up any value for Carr. Maybe after the Draft and after Watkins, Stafford are resolved. [Reply]
Originally Posted by -King-:
I think 49ers are in such win now mode, they'll be willing to keep kicking the cap can down the road Saints style to try to win a SB.
I actually think they need to take a step back from that thinking probably.
Their best two players are very young (Kittle, Bosa). Sherman is a FA, along with Trent Williams, their stud FB, three other starting DBs from this year. I’m sure they will let Ford go if they can. Just lost Saleh too.
Roster wise, I don’t think they’re going to be where they were maybe last year even before they look into the QB market. [Reply]