ChiefsPlanet Mobile
Page 2 of 2
< 12
Washington DC and The Holy Land>Every Sane Person Saw This Coming. Pedophile "identifies" as 8yr old girl
JohnnyHammersticks 01:11 PM 01-14-2020
January 13th, 2020
WALSH: Every Sane Person Saw This Coming. Now A Pedophile Claims He Identifies As An 8-Year-Old Girl.
By Matt Walsh DailyWire.com

A convicted sex offender in Michigan is heading to prison for 10–20 years after being caught with child pornography on his computer. What makes this case interesting is the defense that 45-year-old Joseph Gobrick offered in court. Speaking to a judge at his sentencing hearing, Gobrick claimed that he has a First Amendment right to look at child porn. He also claimed that he identifies as an eight-year-old girl.

“I’ve always been an eight-year-old girl,’’ Gobrick contended. “Even in my drawings and fantasies, I am always an eight-year-old girl. … There are adults having sex with me in an online forum as an eight-year-old girl.”

The judge apparently did not find this argument persuasive. No reasonable person would. But an obvious question is raised here. Why exactly can’t Gobrick identity as a young girl? On what basis can we deny or disqualify his self-identification?

Again, the reasonable among us know the answer. He can’t identify as one because he isn’t one. According to all available metrics, he is a 45-year-old pervert, not a third grader. He cannot choose to be a different age. He is the age he is, and that’s all there is to it. It is either insanity or willful deception that causes him to make this claim about himself. We therefore are perfectly justified in refuting his self-identity and refusing to play along with it. More than merely justified, we are in fact morally obliged to insist on truth over harmful fantasies and delusions.

But propagators of left-wing gender theory are not reasonable. Rather, they insist on unreason. They argue that a man can be a woman — not just symbolically or legally, but actually, literally — even in spite of the testimony of his own biological and chromosomal makeup. In the case of a man identifying as a woman, the only thing that matters, they say, is how he feels about himself. The objective facts are irrelevant. Biology is a moot point. He need provide no proof. We are to take him at his word, and that’s all there is to it.

Well, if biology and physical reality are irrelevant to the question of sex, why should they suddenly be relevant to the question of age? If Gobrick can identify as a female, why can’t he identify as a female of whatever age he chooses? At least a man who “feels like a child” can rightly point out that he was once a child, so he has some frame of reference for judging these feelings. And at least it does make sense, in the case of certain mental disabilities, to say that an adult “has the brain of a child.” None of this vindicates Gobrick to any extent at all, but my point is that transageism is actually more credible and makes more sense than transgenderism. It’s still bogus, but slightly less so. Age does change, after all. I will not be a 33-year-old man forever. But I will be a man forever. If my sex is a fluid characteristic, how much more fluid must my age be?

More
[Reply]
Just Passin' By 03:07 PM 01-14-2020
Originally Posted by BigBeauford:
You know what else same people can do? They understand the concept of nuance.

"We all know Bob is a she, but we since she would like to be called a he, that's fine since we arent massive assholes".
That's not nuance. That's stupidity.
[Reply]
Just Passin' By 03:25 PM 01-14-2020
https://victorygirlsblog.com/the-pro...ing-stupidity/
[Reply]
Frazod 03:28 PM 01-14-2020
Prison Bitch identifies as a man. That's even crazier!
[Reply]
VAChief 03:52 PM 01-14-2020
Originally Posted by Frazod:
Prison Bitch identifies as a submissive. That's believable!
FYP
[Reply]
ping2000 04:07 PM 01-14-2020
Please remove this thing from my planet.
[Reply]
listopencil 04:36 PM 01-14-2020
I'm not a nucular scientician or anything but I'm pretty sure this is how Rome fell.
[Reply]
rabblerouser 08:19 AM 01-15-2020
Originally Posted by BigBeauford:
You know what else same people can do? They understand the concept of nuance.

"We all know Bob is a she, but we since she would like to be called a he, that's fine since we arent massive assholes".

Vs.

"He diddles kids. **** that guy".
Um, no.

If Bob has the XX chromosome, then Bob would be a girl, and we would call Bob "she".

If Bob had the XY chromosome, then Bob would be a boy, so that's when we call Bob "he."

It's a simple concept for people who understand biology.
[Reply]
Baby Lee 08:26 AM 01-15-2020
Criminal defendants always have the freedom to assert whatever defense they think applicable or that they think they can credibly present. As their guilt is more and more apparent, their defenses become more and more exotic and desperate.

About the only thing you could possibly hang on the activists community here is maybe spurring the imagination of this defendant and his defense counsel.

Just because someone asserts a defense doesn't mean anyone buys it, and it doesn't look like anyone is buying it here.

Heck, 30-40 years ago, defendants were trying to blame their criminal acts on dietary imbalances [the twinkie defense], and it never brought in a wave of snack exonerations. Same thing here.
[Reply]
Prison Bitch 08:52 AM 01-15-2020
In 10 years Dems will be defending pedophilia while Pubes will cry out “Now hold on a minute I agreed on homos and trannies and drag queen story hours, I can’t go this far again!”


:-)
[Reply]
JohnnyHammersticks 09:36 AM 01-15-2020
Originally Posted by Just Passin' By:
https://victorygirlsblog.com/the-pro...ing-stupidity/
"Anyone else want to feed this fuckbag into a woodchipper feet first, instead of indulging his psychosis?"

:-):-)
[Reply]
rabblerouser 10:07 AM 01-15-2020
Originally Posted by JohnnyHammersticks:
"Anyone else want to feed this ****bag into a woodchipper feet first, instead of indulging his psychosis?"

:-):-)
Maria Hernandez gets it.
[Reply]
Page 2 of 2
< 12
Up