ChiefsPlanet Mobile
Page 1 of 2
1 2 >
Washington DC and The Holy Land>Every Sane Person Saw This Coming. Pedophile "identifies" as 8yr old girl
JohnnyHammersticks 01:11 PM 01-14-2020
January 13th, 2020
WALSH: Every Sane Person Saw This Coming. Now A Pedophile Claims He Identifies As An 8-Year-Old Girl.
By Matt Walsh DailyWire.com

A convicted sex offender in Michigan is heading to prison for 10–20 years after being caught with child pornography on his computer. What makes this case interesting is the defense that 45-year-old Joseph Gobrick offered in court. Speaking to a judge at his sentencing hearing, Gobrick claimed that he has a First Amendment right to look at child porn. He also claimed that he identifies as an eight-year-old girl.

“I’ve always been an eight-year-old girl,’’ Gobrick contended. “Even in my drawings and fantasies, I am always an eight-year-old girl. … There are adults having sex with me in an online forum as an eight-year-old girl.”

The judge apparently did not find this argument persuasive. No reasonable person would. But an obvious question is raised here. Why exactly can’t Gobrick identity as a young girl? On what basis can we deny or disqualify his self-identification?

Again, the reasonable among us know the answer. He can’t identify as one because he isn’t one. According to all available metrics, he is a 45-year-old pervert, not a third grader. He cannot choose to be a different age. He is the age he is, and that’s all there is to it. It is either insanity or willful deception that causes him to make this claim about himself. We therefore are perfectly justified in refuting his self-identity and refusing to play along with it. More than merely justified, we are in fact morally obliged to insist on truth over harmful fantasies and delusions.

But propagators of left-wing gender theory are not reasonable. Rather, they insist on unreason. They argue that a man can be a woman — not just symbolically or legally, but actually, literally — even in spite of the testimony of his own biological and chromosomal makeup. In the case of a man identifying as a woman, the only thing that matters, they say, is how he feels about himself. The objective facts are irrelevant. Biology is a moot point. He need provide no proof. We are to take him at his word, and that’s all there is to it.

Well, if biology and physical reality are irrelevant to the question of sex, why should they suddenly be relevant to the question of age? If Gobrick can identify as a female, why can’t he identify as a female of whatever age he chooses? At least a man who “feels like a child” can rightly point out that he was once a child, so he has some frame of reference for judging these feelings. And at least it does make sense, in the case of certain mental disabilities, to say that an adult “has the brain of a child.” None of this vindicates Gobrick to any extent at all, but my point is that transageism is actually more credible and makes more sense than transgenderism. It’s still bogus, but slightly less so. Age does change, after all. I will not be a 33-year-old man forever. But I will be a man forever. If my sex is a fluid characteristic, how much more fluid must my age be?

More
[Reply]
Just Passin' By 01:16 PM 01-14-2020
Sounds like he needed to be grounded for a long, long time.
[Reply]
BigBeauford 01:17 PM 01-14-2020
So what was the point of this article? He went to prison, and the only people trying to make a "connection" here is your lot.
[Reply]
digger 01:19 PM 01-14-2020

[Reply]
digger 01:20 PM 01-14-2020
https://dailycaller.com/2018/07/09/p...gbt-community/


Pedophiles Believe They Should Be A Part Of The LGBT Community
[Reply]
Fish 01:22 PM 01-14-2020
Saw what coming? That a grown ass man wouldn't be able to identify as a child and get away with it? Yeah, who could have seen that coming?
[Reply]
NinerDoug 01:33 PM 01-14-2020
Well, crazy people say all sorts of crazy shit.

Key words here:

"The judge apparently did not find this argument persuasive."
[Reply]
BIG_DADDY 01:38 PM 01-14-2020
Originally Posted by Fish:
Saw what coming? That a grown ass man wouldn't be able to identify as a child and get away with it? Yeah, who could have seen that coming?
1000 special ed students could easily understand the point he was making yet the great self-proclaimed internet scientist fails. Yeah, who could have seen that coming?
[Reply]
vailpass 01:42 PM 01-14-2020
Originally Posted by Fish:
Saw what coming? That a grown ass man wouldn't be able to identify as a woman and get away with it? Yeah, who could have seen that coming?
^
[Reply]
JohnnyHammersticks 01:42 PM 01-14-2020
Originally Posted by BIG_DADDY:
1000 special ed students could easily understand the point he was making yet the great self-proclaimed internet scientist fails. Yeah, who could have seen that coming?
Why would he spoil his epic streak of being wrong about everything?

Joe Dimaggio is looking down with admiration on the consistency Fish displays. :-)
[Reply]
BucEyedPea 01:52 PM 01-14-2020
Originally Posted by BIG_DADDY:
1000 special ed students could easily understand the point he was making yet the great self-proclaimed internet scientist fails. Yeah, who could have seen that coming?
:-)
[Reply]
Fish 02:12 PM 01-14-2020
Originally Posted by BIG_DADDY:
1000 special ed students could easily understand the point he was making yet the great self-proclaimed internet scientist fails. Yeah, who could have seen that coming?
Not surprised that you and the special ed kids fail to see the irony here....
[Reply]
Pogue 02:26 PM 01-14-2020
Originally Posted by BigBeauford:
So what was the point of this article? He went to prison, and the only people trying to make a "connection" here is your lot.
^ identifies as a Chicken.



[Reply]
digger 02:34 PM 01-14-2020




I mean it's a never end story...
[Reply]
AdolfOliverBush 01-14-2020, 02:41 PM
This message has been deleted by AdolfOliverBush.
BigBeauford 03:03 PM 01-14-2020
You know what else same people can do? They understand the concept of nuance.

"We all know Bob is a she, but we since she would like to be called a he, that's fine since we arent massive assholes".

Vs.

"He diddles kids. Fuck that guy".
[Reply]
Page 1 of 2
1 2 >
Up