Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla:
So, vote no. That seems fairly clear.
I didn't vote in the poll because I wanted to wait until facts came out. If it did turn out that he was guilty then I might have voted yes. But if it turned out this was much less than what was being reported (or in this case a big nothing burger) then I would vote no. I never did vote because what's the point now. [Reply]
YEp, I voted yes at the time, happy to be absolutely wrong. Thought he was absolutely done when everything came to light. Glad the Chiefs and the NFL did their due diligence [Reply]
Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla:
There was ZERO reason to release him then; there is ZERO reason to release him now.
If he did the things he was accused of I didn't want him to play football again but I wanted the NFL to draw that line. I didn't want more facts to come out (they did) and him get scooped up by another team. [Reply]
Nice thread. If the PC crowd would have gotten their way we would all be crying about what other team is gonna get a top 5 receiver. Maybe the Brownies could give us Kareem back. [Reply]
Originally Posted by kcpasco:
Nice thread. If the PC crowd would have gotten their way we would all be crying about what other team is gonna get a top 5 receiver. Maybe the Brownies could give us Kareem back.
Careful, some folks would rather not discuss Kareem and how he was prematurely/thoughtlessly jettisoned from the team. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Lzen:
There are so many examples of the court of public opinion jumping the gun on these athletes that you'd think we would have learned by now. Duke LaCrosse, Kobe rape allegations, etc.
Yeah. I guess that I've always had a problem with him due to the guilty plea from the 2014 incident, so it was really easy for me to believe the new lies. Now it all seems like BS. I really did learn a lesson here. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla:
Careful, some folks would rather not discuss Kareem and how he was prematurely/thoughtlessly jettisoned from the team.
