when you're that bereft of talent, does that matter?
[Reply]

When a box safety nets 2 1's a 3 and a player...it makes you wonder but it also makes me baffled at anyone thinking it's just 2 1's.
[Reply]

It’s a white Alien...
[Reply]

Jags are only team I'd consider because that brings Trevor Lawrence. If they're not interested, or Deshaun says he's too good for them, it's scorched earth time.
[Reply]

You really want to play the young QB you just traded away twice a year?

Plus I don’t see the Jags wanting to give up more for Watson when they can stay put and draft Lawrence.
[Reply]

I don't think Jacksonville takes that deal, I wouldn't.
[Reply]

Well, Watson might be looking for more money, especially if he holds out into the regular season and we're potentially talking voided signing bonus. This really comes down to how stubborn the Texans want to be and how much leverage they're going to lose before trading him.
[Reply]

[Reply]

This would all make for a really interesting 30 for 30 but so would the Scott Pioli era of the Chiefs and it didn't get one.
[Reply]

Watson for Aaron Rodgers?
[Reply]

Watson for their 1st, straight up. I wouldn't take it if I were them because I want that rookie QB contract. But Watson is a proven NFL commodity so you never know.
[Reply]

Because someone paid too much for a safety once doesn't mean it doubles the market for a QB. You would literally be killing your team for years to come to get a QB that's not worth that kind of capital on top of the contract $.


Any GM doing this would almost certainly be setting himself up to fail. 4 #1's AND the top $ contract is waaaaay too much.
[Reply]

He's the most valuable commodity in sports, you have to act like it in a trade.
[Reply]

I don’t think the Texans will trade him unless it gets very ugly. Doesn’t sound like they plan on it either.
[Reply]

Lol. Nobody is getting four first rounders.
[Reply]