He had a shitty Combine, so there’s that....
[Reply]

Just reading up. Sounds like he was slow/sluggish, but not disastrous. I'm not sure how an edge talent (on film) like that drops to the bottom of the 1st though.
[Reply]

Epenesa’s 40 wasn’t ideal, but his 10 was more on par with the other big edge rushers and his vertical and broad jump were solid.

I think the athleticism angle is overblown with him.
[Reply]

This!!! Iowa players never put up good bench press numbers because they don't do that lift in college. His level of performance has been top 15 and I would be floored if he drops below 20. I think he has 10-15 pick talent. Seems like teams are spreading false negatives hoping he will fall to them.
[Reply]

almost the total player
[Reply]

Seriously, though.... what are the odds he's there at 32.

0%? 10%? 50%?
[Reply]

Spend a calling to 32 would put a smile on my face
[Reply]

Stupid spell check!

Epenesa falling to 32....
[Reply]

I’d say close to 50/50.
[Reply]

0
[Reply]

:-)

I laughed...
[Reply]

Really?

I’d say slim to none, even if his testing was pedestrian...
[Reply]

I’m basing this on all of the current noise that he’s going to fall out of round 1. There’s a lot of smoke.
[Reply]

I think it's bend that gets him knocked a bit.

He can show a little stiff at times. Sort of a rich man's Eric Hicks in a way - Hicks could be damn productive at times but if you could force him out wide, he wasn't gonna bend the edge and dip a shoulder to cut around you.

I think Epenesa is better at EVERYTHING than Hicks, but ol' Hicks gets a bit of a bad rap as a pass rusher because how often that bootleg ate his ass alive. He was a quality player for most of his career.

Make that 2002 version of Hicks a premier run defender as well and you have something similar to what Epenesa will be. Take the average of that 5 year run from 99 through 2003, add another 25% to it and I think you get something really similar to Epenesa.
[Reply]