Last season they fucked us up for an entire half in both games before we boatraced them.
This time Andy seemed to figure out how to use everyone on the offense effectively and kept the Patriots guessing. The offense moved a lot more consistently.
The second half was kind of a mess...BUT...Andy clearly went a bit conservative.
I felt like he definitely left some stuff in his bag of tricks, and if Kelce doesn't fumble, we probably put another 6 up. Not to mention Patrick's hand.
So the question is...do we feel confident that adding Hardman and Mahomes progression has slayed this beast?
I think Mahomes playing with a broken hand was valiant but some of his throws were a bit off but playing with a broken hand I think slowed it down a bit. His ability to regenerate healing his broken hand before next game is remarkable. [Reply]
Rewatching the game it seems like we were moving the ball pretty well all day just had some unfortunate miscues that hurt us. Still not the explosion we saw all of last year but teams are protecting themselves from the killshots so we're taking what's there. [Reply]
if you can roll his ankle, relocate his kneecap, and make him land on his hand awkwardly (speaking of that word, the word in and of itself is awkward), you turn him into alex smith :-) [Reply]
Originally Posted by Nickhead:
teams now have tape on mahomes:
if you can roll his ankle, relocate his kneecap, and make him land on his hand awkwardly (speaking of that word, the word in and of itself is awkward), you turn him into alex smith :-)
And he still passes for the most yards by any QB this season against the so called greatest defense in the past 10 years. [Reply]
Do you people even watch the games? Can you keep score?
It was plain as day. Andy and Mahomes had bills defense figured out in the second quarter.
The only thing that stopped them from hanging 40 points on the patriots this time what is the hand injury. Which was also obvious, and Andy even admitted to it after the game.
Jesus Christ some of you people can’t see the forest for the trees… [Reply]
