ChiefsPlanet Mobile
Page 6 of 32
« First < 23456 7891016 > Last »
Washington DC and The Holy Land>The IG report on FISA has dropped. Here's the link to a PDF version
Just Passin' By 12:09 PM 12-09-2019
https://www.justice.gov/storage/120919-examination.pdf
[Reply]
lawrenceRaider 01:16 PM 12-09-2019
Originally Posted by Donger:
I take it that's a no?

Do you accept this?

The report from Michael Horowitz, inspector general, released today didn't find "documentary or testimonial evidence that political bias or improper motivation influenced the decisions" to open investigations that initially focused on campaign advisers Carter Page, George Papadopoulos, Michael Flynn and Paul Manafort, former campaign chairman.
Considering your buddy Steele was specifically mentioned as being full of shit . . .
[Reply]
Marcellus 01:17 PM 12-09-2019
Originally Posted by Donger:
https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/show...postcount=4760

:-)
And here is my prediction which is spot on. :-)

Originally Posted by Marcellus:
The report is going to be like everything else. It will not be an end all be all bombshell but will have plenty of damning info to fuel the Repubs and will fall short enough to give Dems a cry for justification.

Donger will likely hit 10,000 posts in the thread but use a total of only 10 or 11 unique words.
https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/show...postcount=4760
[Reply]
Just Passin' By 01:17 PM 12-09-2019
Originally Posted by Ninerfan11:
HOLY CRAP, that is real shoes. This is becoming the real deal. Juicy.
Given all we know about how this came together, and given the obvious problems with the IG position, it would have been shocking if Durham didn't have disagreements with Horowitz.
[Reply]
mlyonsd 01:17 PM 12-09-2019
Originally Posted by digger:

Ruh-roh. Dueling DOJ banjos.
[Reply]
Donger 01:19 PM 12-09-2019
Originally Posted by Marcellus:
And here is my prediction which is spot on. :-)



https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/show...postcount=4760
You linked your post that I already posted?
[Reply]
LiveSteam 01:20 PM 12-09-2019
Originally Posted by Donger:
Yes, of course.

Are you predicting that he has/will find something that Horowitz did not?
He came out with in the hour stating that he disagrees with the findings.
[Reply]
Donger 01:21 PM 12-09-2019
Originally Posted by MagicHef:
OK? He still affected the decision. He was directly involved, according to your quote.
So, Priestap acted out of bias?
[Reply]
lawrenceRaider 01:21 PM 12-09-2019
Originally Posted by Donger:
You linked your post that I already posted?
You going to ignore that your hero Steele was specifically mentioned as having a bunk report that the FBI inappropriately used to start surveillance?
[Reply]
Donger 01:22 PM 12-09-2019
Originally Posted by lawrenceRaider:
Considering your buddy Steele was specifically mentioned as being full of shit . . .
I don't know the chap, so hardly a buddy. How was he mentioned?
[Reply]
MagicHef 01:23 PM 12-09-2019
Originally Posted by Donger:
So, Priestap acted out of bias?
How do you get that from what I said?
[Reply]
Donger 01:25 PM 12-09-2019
Originally Posted by MagicHef:
How do you get that from what I said?
He made the decision to open the investigation.
[Reply]
Marcellus 01:25 PM 12-09-2019
Originally Posted by Donger:
You linked your post that I already posted?
Had the wrong one open but I quoted my post, can you not read?

Originally Posted by Marcellus:
The report is going to be like everything else. It will not be an end all be all bombshell but will have plenty of damning info to fuel the Repubs and will fall short enough to give Dems a cry for justification.

Donger will likely hit 10,000 posts in the thread but use a total of only 10 or 11 unique words.

https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showpost...postcount=3143
[Reply]
MagicHef 01:29 PM 12-09-2019
Originally Posted by Donger:
He made the decision to open the investigation.
OK. I didn't make a claim that he was biased, or that the decision was biased. I only took issue with this claim of yours:

Originally Posted by Donger:
Horowitz specifically wrote that Peter Strzok and Lisa Page did not affect the start of the investigation and didnít act out of political bias.

[Reply]
Donger 01:32 PM 12-09-2019
Originally Posted by Marcellus:
Had the wrong one open but I quoted my post, can you not read?




https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showpost...postcount=3143
That's nice. You questioned me on whether or not I'd accept Horowitz' conclusions, for some reason.

Why?
[Reply]
Donger 01:33 PM 12-09-2019
Originally Posted by MagicHef:
OK. I didn't make a claim that he was biased, or that the decision was biased. I only took issue with this claim of yours:
That isn't my claim. I didn't write that.
[Reply]
Page 6 of 32
« First < 23456 7891016 > Last »
Up