So good apples need to call out bad apples but not investigate the incident because they’re police? Instead, a panel of non police should get involved? And if they’re found guilty; they should be accountable financially from retirement funds?

I’m not sure you realize the process.

In a shooting, all around the Missouri cities and counties and around Texas areas; from witnessing first hand;

They are treated as a crime scene. After emergency situations are taken care of.... Controlled access. Video, pictures. Area canvas for witnesses. For other cameras, for other factors. Other agencies are called, uninvolved counties, the state, and federal agencies. The prosecutors office is called. They all collaborate individually to find the truth for themselves. Not sharing with the media, witnesses or each other. And after it’s compared to find the truth that matches evidence, witness and medical examiners reports and the individual investigators. Most times now, if it gets racially motivated through media, individual (private) investigators and independent medical examiners will be bought and paid for from groups connected to unions, churches or groups like NAACP or BLM or rich individuals in politics or media or entertainment.

Then the whole case goes to the prosecutor's office and lawyers for or against the police officer and judges start their pursuit of the truth. This is also when political, ethical, moral corruption has a chance to really shine. It’s not on scene, because all the investigators working for their individual county, star and federal agencies or defense/prosecution offices and the 2-4 medical examiners will be able to prove if someone initially moved a body, took evidence, planted etc

Which is why I find it mind boggling Darren Wilson is still considered a bad apple to many out there holding BLM signs. Why that case is listed as an example of police brutality. The case went all the way to the DOJ with Eric Holder under Obama’s administration and why Kim Gardner hasn’t been able to reopen the case. And that’s not the only example.

Anyway. This place has a history of only saying things for humor or to get a rise out of someone, so I’ll graciously back out now and let the normal rhetoric resume. I’ll leave you with another officer’s thoughts on it.


https://m.facebook.com/frbaUSA/photo...pe=3&source=48
[Reply]

It was 25% in 1965, so I don’t see how it’s a function of racism going back generations, but whatever you have to do to fulfill your white guilt!

One other thing, you damn sure wouldn’t talk to me in person like you do on here, because just looking at you I already know I’d knock your ass the fuck out in less than 5 seconds. Maybe I’ll come to a game and we can meet up? See if you are as ballsy in real life as you are on the internet.
[Reply]

I don't think anyone is blind to that. But you're asking people to fix themselves in a broken system vs asking why the system isn't working for the people. Improving the system goes a long way to fix the problems. The system is failing the people a hell of a lot more than people are failing the system.
[Reply]

Sir, there isn't one type of affirmative action. I'm well aware of the concept of 'mismatch' where college-age minorities ended up in situations that they were ill-prepared for and that had the opposite effect.

But what if those same students were given more of an advantage at all levels of schooling?
[Reply]

But the system is better now for them than it was in 1965. There’s no excuse for the black family to be in this bad of shape in 2020.
[Reply]

I'm sorry if you make nonsensical arguments on an Internet forum and that makes you keen to exact retribution. I've met dozens of people on CP without issue but don't remember you ever attending any of the games. Look forward to meeting up and getting your opinion on some of those studies, tough guy!
[Reply]

Don’t avoid the first part of my post.

25% in 1965 to 73% in 2019. A function of racism going back generations?

And when less that 10% are committing 50% of the murders leading to much more police attention and you don’t acknowledge that with those studies, what’s the point in discussing them?
[Reply]

The idea isn't to take police out of the equation. Of course police are best suited to investigate these sort of matters. But there is a flaw in allowing an organization to investigate themselves. Canada has an independent investigation unit (IIU) that provides oversight to investigations and conducts independent investigations when necessary. Sure it's not perfect but is that worse than a system today that provides no oversight? Accountability in many areas is practically non existent. Data is constantly incomplete, lost, or completely hidden from the public. In the instance of Floyd and Arbery, does anyone think any of this would have been even dealt with if not for a civilian taking a video? Hell, the Arbery case was non existent until videos popped up months later.

It is checks and balances. Agreed, it is not perfect but neither is our current system.
[Reply]

In traffic accidents they do. And they do more than they would for another accident.

In fataliity shootings they do not! They call in other agencies, Impartial investigators. It’s been this way every where I’ve been for 28 years. When investigating a crime, an impartial witness is more important to the case than a partial witness. But you take both and compare to the facts, evidence. Weed out the more and less truthful versions. You don’t tell everyone or the media so a partial witness can appear impartial. You wait to hear what they have and why they have it.

Some people watch to much tv and start yelling in a megaphone. Just to get a few seconds of notoriety.
[Reply]

I just think that's a very blanket statement, I myself am not familiar with it. The entire subject seems foreign to me as I wasn't brought up like that.
[Reply]

Please don't.
[Reply]

Of course he enjoys it. It's always staylor, in the middle of everything, every single time. He's like the one constant in every CP argument.
[Reply]

Thanks for finally admitting that.

And no thank you for mischaracterizing my position entirely.
[Reply]

Lmao the sheer amount of faggot in this thread is too damn high
[Reply]

I don't believe it will make any difference.

Sent from my SM-G973U1 using Tapatalk
[Reply]