I’d like to listen to that interview. Can you post the link?
[Reply]

I got it off yahoo news
[Reply]

[Reply]

I was getting an ID Error off of Dane's link. Maybe something with my machine.

Here's a simple link to the video - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QSk8G7tIZFI

I like Brett Veach. He is so straight forward with his interviews and answers. You can tell he enjoys his work.
[Reply]

So possibly some extra money for Jones?
[Reply]

The extra 100 million they are saying will go in this year if it's approved translates to 3 million a team, big money eh?
[Reply]

“Risky!!!!!!”

Like trading an All-Pro caliber player on a contender isn’t risky.

Ohh wait, just ask the Seahawks, who tried to replace Frank Clark with LJ fucking Collier.

You’re right, let’s not be the Seahawks.

Also, where does the idea come from that trading Jones automatically gives you 4-5 good starters? How are you getting the other 3? Free agency? Who are you going to pay in this years market? Is that not risky as well?

This idea that there’s not a comparable amount of risk both ways is really naive and dismissive of just how good Chris Jones is.
[Reply]

Also, what the fuck is this emotion shit you two keep spewing?

We don’t want to keep Jones because of emotions. We want to keep Jones because he’s the second best interior pass rusher in the league and is just now entering his prime. Get the fuck out of here with that stupid narrative you guys are going with.
[Reply]

Fescoe also was advocating for signing Austin Ekeker and sacrificing their first to do it.

Dumbo.
[Reply]

In the Trenches - Combine Special: B.J. Kissel interviews with Andy Reid, Brett Veach, Charles Davis, and Mike Borgonzi. Actually some of the best information is from Chiefs Director of Football Operations, Mike Borgonzi.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MUYnOh-lVMs
[Reply]

I honestly don't think we win the SB without Jones coming up big down the stretch. Players like him do NOT grow on trees so as much as getting extra picks and having more cap space is tempting, I think it would be utterly stupid to let that young man go tbh. Anyway it seems clear the Chiefs are gonna be in for a RB and they have met or are meeting with Moss, Dobbins and Clyde Edwards!!..that's exciting to hear because imo giving Pat a legit run-game would take this offense to another planet.
[Reply]

Link?
[Reply]

I posted the Clyde Edwards a couple pages back.
[Reply]

HERE , HERE and HERE
[Reply]

I'd be perfectly fine with a top RB.

That's another plus in terms of Shenault. Colorado ran the wildcat with him quite a bit. He'd be almost like another RB. Hard as hell to tackle. I just don't think he drops that far, but the WR depth in this draft is freaking insane, so you never know I guess.
[Reply]