Originally Posted by JD10367:
I disagree. There's always been a question in the NFL of "Coach vs. QB". Was Montana really that great, or did Bill Walsh have more to do with it? Was it Marino, or Shula? Was the Cowboys dynasty QB driven, or was it all Tom Landry? Is Pitt's recent success more Rapistberger, or Cowher/Tomlin? I think Belichick is probably more of the equation than Brady. Either he's an excellent coach (if you're a Patriots fan) or an excellent cheater (if you're a Chiefs fan), but either way I don't see why he can't be successful post-Brady. I think we'll get the answer pretty soon because I doubt Brady is back and, if he is, it's only for one more year. Will Belichick win the AFC East and make it to the AFCCG every season like he's been doing? Probably not. But I don't see why he can't maintain the team in the second tier along with the Houstons and Baltimores of the conference (since the first tier will be the Chiefs).
Originally Posted by eDave:
This pile-on reeks of insecurity.
Yeah, I don’t really get it.
But still - us throwing down the Patriots in Foxboro felt like a franchise turning point. Mahomes was injured and could barely throw the ball - but it didn’t matter. We were the better team and it felt like Bill B. knew it from the beginning.
It also ended up being the deciding game that landed us a first round bye. [Reply]
Looks like PB is absolutely right, Asterix has a lot of you completley fooled. He's been a member for 17 years and has over 43 thousand posts, but can't muster up even one to wish the board a congrats? Pathetic. He had no problem gloating about 28-3 right after it happened, even though no one here gave a ****.
But God forbid taking 30 seconds to say congrats to a fanbase that hadn't seen their team even play in, let alone win a SB since ****ing Richard Nixon was in office. He's a phony and those of you defending him look stupid. [Reply]
Originally Posted by CasselGotPeedOn:
Looks like PB is absolutely right, Asterix has a lot of you completley fooled. He's been a member for 17 years and has over 43 thousand posts, but can't muster up even one to wish the board a congrats? Pathetic. He had no problem gloating about 28-3 right after it happened, even though no one here gave a ****.
But God forbid taking 30 seconds to say congrats to a fanbase that hadn't seen their team even play in, let alone win a SB since ****ing Richard Nixon was in office. He's a phony and those of you defending him look stupid.
Originally Posted by CasselGotPeedOn:
Looks like PB is absolutely right, Asterix has a lot of you completley fooled. He's been a member for 17 years and has over 43 thousand posts, but can't muster up even one to wish the board a congrats? Pathetic. He had no problem gloating about 28-3 right after it happened, even though no one here gave a ****.
But God forbid taking 30 seconds to say congrats to a fanbase that hadn't seen their team even play in, let alone win a SB since ****ing Richard Nixon was in office. He's a phony and those of you defending him look stupid.
Who fucking cares. Last thing any one should need is a fan of another team to congratulate them on a win.
Why do you need that validation? Wasn't watching the Chiefs win the superbowl sufficient.
And what type of person needs to be congratulated on something they had zero physical involvement in? [Reply]
Originally Posted by CasselGotPeedOn:
Looks like PB is absolutely right, Asterix has a lot of you completley fooled. He's been a member for 17 years and has over 43 thousand posts, but can't muster up even one to wish the board a congrats? Pathetic. He had no problem gloating about 28-3 right after it happened, even though no one here gave a ****.
But God forbid taking 30 seconds to say congrats to a fanbase that hadn't seen their team even play in, let alone win a SB since ****ing Richard Nixon was in office. He's a phony and those of you defending him look stupid.
