Sign Reiff.
Draft Little or Hudson and let them sit for a year.
[Reply]

I'm really thinking that an Okung/Reiff short deal plus Little at #63 is now my personal plan A.
[Reply]

Throw D’Ante Smith in there too as a day 2 option.
[Reply]

We’re going to need a center though. I’ll be interested to see if they sign someone or Veach goes with a rookie.
[Reply]

I dunno, it's irrational but opting out just sits kinda wrong with me.
[Reply]

It should get your attention when Pest isn't high on an Irish player, lol.
[Reply]

For someone that was so tuned in to the whole COVID thing, this seems an odd stance.
[Reply]

I'm also not a fan of sitting a 1st or 2nd round pick that isn't a QB. IF you're taking a guy that high, he needs to play or be able to play early.
[Reply]

He’s all floor with no ceiling. Will he be good from day one? In the right offense. He isn’t going to get a whole lot better, IMO.
[Reply]

What are you going to do, trade up into the teens and try to get a day 1 starter?

To do that, you'd have to trade next year's 1st most likely and then you have a 1st round pick that isn't sitting for a year, he simply never exists.

How is that better?
[Reply]

It's definitely not what I would have thought a while back.

I get why they would do it, it makes sense, just not a fan of it for some reason.
[Reply]

Well, if you can't mortgage your future to move up to pick a sure-fire day one LT in the top ten, then you are taking a high potential guy that might not be ready day one later.

It's kind of one or the other.
[Reply]

I know, read my last sentence. My point was if you're gonna fork over 2 firsts+ for Tunsil(which is what it'd likely cost) you might as well send that same amt for a rookie-who is projected to be the best LT in the league. Like I just said though, neither is happening.
[Reply]

Draft a different player. Wait til the 3rd or later to take a developmental guy.
[Reply]

Or...hear me out...take a different position?
[Reply]