GEORGETOWN, Guyana (AP) — Officials say a U.S. team is expected soon in the South American nation of Guyana to probe the crash of a Boeing 737 jetliner that all 163 people aboard survived.
Authorities so far have given little idea about the cause of Saturday's crash. The Caribbean Airlines plane ran off the end of a runway at Guyana's main airport and broke in two. About 30 people had to be treated at a local hospital, including the pilot.
The airline is largely owned by the government of Trinidad and Tobago and its prime minister has visited the crash site. Kamla Persad-Bissessar says she is worried that the accident will hurt tourism to the Caribbean, a region that depends heavily on the industry. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Saul Good:
"This" is defined in your OP as the airliner breaking in half.
Way to be redundant here.
I have addressed this more than once in this thread. In fact several times. You are either incapable of understanding or just trolling. Either way it's pitiful.
Originally Posted by Saul Good:
You are a four year old with chocolate all over your face and crumbs on your shirt denying that you snuck a cookie.
Yet, strangely you guys are the ones incessantly pouting and crying, "NO YOU ARE NOT!" :-)
Originally Posted by Saul Good:
You're never going to be able to convince anyone that you didn't eat the cookie
Redundancy #2: I have addressed this and the fact that I do not give a flying turd if anyone is convinced. If you re-read the thread you find out that I have never enforced nor defended the IQ thing. In fact I have tried desperately with links and observations that it is not IMO a valid test. But your side has adamantly stayed on this subject maliciously wanting with all of your souls to believe it's untrue.
Re-read this post at least. MAYBE it'll begin to make a dent in your comprehension of where everybody stands and who's acting with petty bias and who's not. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Einstein 159:
Way to be redundant here.
I have addressed this more than once in this thread. In fact several times. You are either incapable of understanding or just trolling. Either way it's pitiful
As for the Mensa thing, maybe someone with combined IQs in excess of 310 should have been able to figure to figure out for yourselves whether or not it belongs on a resume.
Craig Fisher (twitter: @fishdogs) on his Career Branding for Social Animals blog shared the results of his informal LinkedIN query to recruiters and hiring managers about the top things to leave off the resume. You can read the post with the top 10 list or check out the Wordle image he put together that tells it all.
Craigs' top 10 things to leave off your resume.
10. Religious or Political affiliations
9. Toastmasters
8. Hobbies
7. Photos
6. MENSA
5. Compensation
4. Family info (marital status, children, pets)
3. References available upon request
2. Anything not relevant to the position for which you are applying
1. Objective [Reply]
Perhaps perspective employers are worried that your son, upon having his ass handed to him rhetorically in court, would drop the "I'm in Mensa" card. Even worse, he could be like his father and drop the "the judge hates foreigners" card. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Saul Good:
You and your son are delusional.
The view expressed by the potential employer did ACTUALLY happen We were told by someone who already works in that particular office. We are not delusional. But keep being an asshole if it makes you feel good. Just an observation though: My son is not partaking in this conversation. He's not even a CP member. So please direct all your assholery to your truly.
Originally Posted by Saul Good:
He advised your son to take off the Mensa reference because Mensa is basically an organization of people with zero social skills and inflated opinions of themselves despite their general lack of achievements.
Link please. You must know this for a documented fact. Far be it from me to think it's a loaded opinion you pulled out of your ass.
You perhaps conveniently missed this earlier in the thread, but he routinely scored in the 99 percentile in the ITBS when in HS. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Donger:
Yeah, no, it really didn't. Perhaps you should keep your little fantasies to yourself?
Sure man, sure. :-) It's only important for me to know that you and I know this is true. And we both do. You don't need to play dumb though, I can't search and link that far back. [Reply]
