Originally Posted by FAX:
Defending Krafty on this deal could be tough, given the video evidence.
Of course, the argument could be made that Krafty was actually doing undercover work as a private citizen in order to get the goods on the operation. Under that scenario, he has donated to the sex-trafficking cause but felt that mere money just wasn't enough. Someone had to do what was necessary to expose the culprits. That's why he took that responsibility upon himself at great personal risk.
Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I present to you ... Bob Kraft; Whore Buster.
Originally Posted by RobertWeathers:
Krafty will get a small fine and community service.
Moving on
I doubt the female fans of the Patriots forget...women forget NOTHING!
The legal implications of this are the least of his worries...his public image will take a beating. Will corporate sponsors want to be affiliated with someone who was just busted in a sex trafficking sting?
"Gillette...the best sex slaves a man can get"...*sings jingle* [Reply]
Originally Posted by BlackOp:
I doubt the female fans of the Patriots forget...women forget NOTHING!
The legal implications of this are the least of his worries...his public image will take a beating. Will corporate sponsors want to be affiliated with someone who was just busted in a sex trafficking sting?
"Gillette...the best sex slaves a man can get"...*sings jingle*
I dunna know what NEP sponsors are going to do. As long as they win they'll stick around. I think that and what Goodell would do if he pleaded guilty is whats motivating him now.
Obviously he had a major lapse in judgement and discreteness.
Originally Posted by KCChiefsFan88:
While that may be your fantasy, the reason the video should be released is to have the same Ray Rice/Kareem Hunt impact in terms of public perception.
Seriously? You really think that would be the same? [Reply]
Originally Posted by KCChiefsFan88:
If Kraft is physically abusive/aggressive towards the woman in the video you don't think that would have an impact?
You think a 5' 7", 77 year old man, was like physically dominating them and roughing them up? Yeah, ok, possible, but unlikely.
EXCEPT WAIT -- WE HAVE A FUCKING POLICE REPORT THAT DESCRIBES WHAT HAPPENS AND DOESN'T SAY THAT!
Originally Posted by :
As for incident #2 -- officials describe it in the following way:
"[employee] escorted Kraft to a room identified as JPPD Cam 2. There, the two hugged each other and Kraft took off all his clothing, laid face up on the massage table and [employee] hugged him again. At approximately 1102hrs. (Employee) began manipulating Kraft’s penis and testicles and then put her head down by his penis. This went on several minutes.”
"After a few minutes, [employee] wiped Kraft in the area of his genitals with a white towel, helped him get dressed and hugged him again. Kraft gave [employee] one $100 bill plus at least one other unidentifiable bill."
The first incident, posted earlier in this thread, was roughly similar. You let me know where it says Kraft was "physically abusive/aggressive" and then we can talk. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Amnorix:
You think a 5' 7", 77 year old man, was like physically dominating them and roughing them up? Yeah, ok, possible, but unlikely.
EXCEPT WAIT -- WE HAVE A ****ING POLICE REPORT THAT DESCRIBES WHAT HAPPENS AND DOESN'T SAY THAT!
The first incident, posted earlier in this thread, was roughly similar. You let me know where it says Kraft was "physically abusive/aggressive" and then we can talk.
Yes because the police reports and the nature/context of the incidents shown in the videos were perfectly aligned in the Ray Rice/Kareem Hunt situations.
Originally Posted by KCChiefsFan88:
If Kraft is physically abusive/aggressive towards the woman in the video you don't think that would have an impact?
Physically abusive? Wut? He just got his chop stick stroked. Maybe had his rice balls fondled. It’s not like he bent them over the great wall and hit them in the pu pu platter. [Reply]
Originally Posted by vailpass:
Physically abusive? Wut? He just got his chop stick stroked. Maybe had his rice balls fondled. It’s not like he bent them over the great wall and hit them in the pu pu platter.
Why are you using so many food-related euphemisms. Fetish? :-) [Reply]
Originally Posted by vailpass:
Physically abusive? Wut? He just got his chop stick stroked. Maybe had his rice balls fondled. It’s not like he bent them over the great wall and hit them in the pu pu platter.
Failpass continuing to lead the Denver brigade of Kraft apologists. [Reply]
Originally Posted by KCChiefsFan88:
Yes because the police reports and the nature/context of the incidents shown in the videos were perfectly aligned in the Ray Rice/Kareem Hunt situations.
JFC you are a pathetically stupid Faketriots bandwagoning troll.
Did the police ever see the hunt video?
And neither of those situations were taped by the police, with officers watching every move. Wouldn't they be obligated to help if he had been physically assaulting the women? I mean they had to be close to wrapping up their investigation. [Reply]
Originally Posted by KCChiefsFan88:
If Kraft is physically abusive/aggressive towards the woman in the video you don't think that would have an impact?
He'd be done . Like Joe Paterno done.
I don't see how a hand job gets to where you are though. [Reply]
There is still a strange correlation between multiple billionaires visiting this same strip mall. I could see if Kraft just haphazardly stumbled onto it...but being there is another connection makes it very peculiar...Kraft went there twice in just over a day before flying out.
It was definitely premeditated....(planned)...which makes his meeting with the sexual abuse non-profit a few weeks earlier, disturbing. Just the thought process of having knowledge of the epidemic...then choosing to be a repeat patron.
Billionaires dont go to public strip malls for random sex....way too much risk for someone seeing them. Kraft showed up in a chauffeured Bentley...which would draw attention. Why?
My intuition says he knows who is running the network...or is connected to it...there shouldn't be another Massachusetts billionaire involved in that short period. [Reply]
