He was so furious about being called a racial slur that he ripped a dude's helmet off and beat him over the head with it....
....but totally chill about it 15 minutes later when he didn't mention it AT ALL in the post-game for subsequent several days.
Be more full of shit, Myles. What a pathetic hail mary. And with the NFLPA arguing that he can't receive an indefinite suspension, they oughta just say "Fine - here's 8 games. See your ass in week 3 next year...."
Because as it stands, he'll be reinstated by week 1 of next season. But if he keeps piling this shit on, the NFL should come down even harder. This is just high nonsense. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Marcellus:
Nah there are at least 2 people that know whether it's true. And there would likely be another witness unless Rudolph whispered it into his ear.
Exactly.
If he said it loud enough for Garrett to hear it, DeCastro would've definitely heard it and there's an excellent chance Pouncy or Ogunjobi could have. And NOBODY said anything until Garrett puts it in an appeal document.
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut:
He was so furious about being called a racial slur that he ripped a dude's helmet off and beat him over the head with it....
....but totally chill about it 15 minutes later when he didn't mention it AT ALL in the post-game for subsequent several days.
Be more full of shit, Myles. What a pathetic hail mary. And with the NFLPA arguing that he can't receive an indefinite suspension, they oughta just say "Fine - here's 8 games. See your ass in week 3 next year...."
Because as it stands, he'll be reinstated by week 1 of next season. But if he keeps piling this shit on, the NFL should come down even harder. This is just high nonsense.
I asked Browns DT Sheldon Richardson if Myles Garrett had ever told him what Garrett alleged about Rudolph in the hearing. Richardson said he hadn’t and said my question was the first he’d even heard about it.
Browns safety Damarious Randall said he “figured there was a lot more to the story,” knowing Myles, but that he hadn’t heard about the racial slur allegation
Myles is straight out lying. I would sue Garrett for Defamation and for assault charges
Just asked Baker Mayfield about Garrett’s allegation that Rudolph used a racial slur and he seemed pretty stunned. Said wasn’t something he’d heard, including from anyone on the team, until I just asked him
Even if true- it does not justify his actions. You can't commit a violent crime for a name-calling incident and expect sympathy.
You can in 2019. "Sticks and Stones" died years ago and was replaced with 'microaggressions' and 'words as an act of violence....'
If he'd have said this IMMEDIATELY after the game, the world would've come down hard on Mason Rudolph and Garrett would've probably gotten 3 games because the NFL is terrified of this sort of shit. The NFLPA wouldn't have appealed and everyone would've 'wink/nodded' this thing to bed.
True or otherwise, everyone knows that's the card to play. Garrett just didn't play it and realized the opportunity he missed. Because evidently in 2019 you CAN commit a violent crime for a name-calling incident and expect sympathy. [Reply]
Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE!:
Myles is straight out lying. I would sue Garrett for Defamation and for assault charges
Just asked Baker Mayfield about Garrett’s allegation that Rudolph used a racial slur and he seemed pretty stunned. Said wasn’t something he’d heard, including from anyone on the team, until I just asked him
It's probably gonna fall under the defamation per se umbrella so he wouldn't need to prove actual damages. And it's IMPOSSIBLE for there not to be actual malice on Garrett's part (well, apart from the minuscule possibility that he's telling the truth but again, that doesn't pass the sniff test).
They're notoriously difficult cases to make but they aren't impossible. I do wonder if the fact that the information was leaked (presuming it was submitted confidentially to begin with) would take Garrett off the hook for liability. If he can argue that HE never 'published' the information or otherwise put it out for public consumption, then he can try to say that the defamatory conduct wasn't his. He's not the one that put it into the public conscious. [Reply]
