Chiefs Major Update on Tyreek Hill [old thread, don't freak out] - Page 62

Today at 3:00, Steve will be holding a press conference regarding the criminal investigation involving Tyreek Hill and Crystal Espinal. This will be held in our 4th floor conference room.
— Johnson County KS DA (@JohnsonCoDA) April 24, 2019

From @NFLTotalAccess: The latest on #Chiefs WR Tyreek Hill... pic.twitter.com/5xEpODrhuf
— Ian Rapoport (@RapSheet) April 25, 2019

[Reply]

Originally Posted by Mecca:
So do the Chiefs hold off for awhile and let everything blow over before giving Hill his money?

I’d wait until next offseason and maybe tag for 1 year.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by oldman:
The bottom line is no one can prove who committed the alleged crime. Therefore, any action against Hill by the NFL would and SHOULD get an immediate appeal from the players union. I'd bet they'd win. It could have been Hill, Crystal, in-laws, or even an attempt to save the kid from running into harm.
It's a pretty good bet that Hill didn't lie to the brass as Hunt did, and there's no video of the incident as in Hunt's case.

Article 46 trumps all.

If Goody suspends him, he will stay suspended
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Mecca:
So do the Chiefs hold off for awhile and let everything blow over before giving Hill his money?

That's how I'd play it.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins:
You really want to trust someone that can't stop from being either directly or indirectly involved in situations like this before he's made any real money with a nine figure deal?

Okay...

Better be one hell of a morality clause in any potential extension
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Baby Lee:
Tooth hurty

In the annals of comedy, Dentist Humor is surpassed only by Civil War Amputationist Humor.

FAX
[Reply]

Originally Posted by kcpasco:
I’d wait until next offseason and maybe tag for 1 year.

That may be the best way to play it.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by FAX:
In the annals of comedy, Dentist Humor is surpassed only by Civil War Amputationist Humor.

FAX

:-)
[Reply]

If the NFL was to punish someone for making the league look bad, then Rog ought to start with Kraft. There's video of that crime.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Superturtle:
Better be one hell of a morality clause in any potential extension

Yep basically any incidents the contract is voided. Which is why the contract may take awhile to do
[Reply]

Hill has no leverage to hold out. Dude can’t take anymore bad PR.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Mecca:
Watkins is gone after this year, don't really see much choice, you take Hill off this team we become god awful at WR.

That's how you end up making desperation moves. If he can separate himself from dumbfuckery for a little bit, they might be able to trade him in another two years. You can also use FA.
[Reply]

I'd rather put clauses in his contract that just walk on a guy who will be nearly impossible to replace.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Mecca:
Watkins is gone after this year, don't really see much choice, you take Hill off this team we become god awful at WR.

I honestly wouldn't be shocked if we drafted a WR, depending what's available when our picks roll out.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by oldman:
If the NFL was to punish someone for making the league look bad, then Rog ought to start with Kraft. There's video of that crime.

GROSS!!!
[Reply]

Originally Posted by cooper barrett:
Hey, face it either Tyreek, Crystal, her mother, the godfather or anyone else who wanted a free house listened to the Atty and said nothing.

Is he guilty? YES!...... Of salvaging his career.

Is the kid going to be ****ed up because of the State of Kansas and the Dept of children's protective services?, or whatever they glamorized the name to be.

Dammed right he is.

That little boy is ****ed for life. Sooner he is out of the states control the better. This is how they **** the parents when they listen to their lawyers.

Myself, I think it was the butler with a candlestick.

If Tyreek Hill would have placed his rage on you he'd be a hell of a lot more sympathetic.
[Reply]