ChiefsPlanet Mobile
Page 10 of 11
« First < 678910 11 >
Washington DC and The Holy Land>Rod Rosenstein testifies on Crossfire Hurricane Investigation
BleedingRed 08:47 AM 06-03-2020


So basically Rat Rod said he let Mueller's gang of criminals write their own scope memo, and then he signed off on it despite there being zero evidence.
[Reply]
JohnnyHammersticks 04:00 PM 06-03-2020
Originally Posted by LiveSteam:
We were doing so good an hour ago.
I noticed that too.

I thought maybe critical mass had finally been achieved in terms of people finally realizing that responding to - and especially quoting - Dunger was a bigger waste of time than trying to have a debate with a kumquat.
[Reply]
Donger 04:02 PM 06-03-2020
Originally Posted by MagicHef:
So you had it backwards. You just disproved what you tried to claim in post #130.
Yes, I was incorrect in the timing, but Papajohnpapolus continued to communicate with Mifsud after the April meeting.

He told Downer about Russia having the emails on May 10.

So, again, why don't you think he was trying to get dirt on Clinton?
[Reply]
MagicHef 04:07 PM 06-03-2020
Originally Posted by Donger:
Yes, I was incorrect in the timing, but Papajohnpapolus continued to communicate with Mifsud after the April meeting.

He told Downer about Russia having the emails on May 10.

So, again, why don't you think he was trying to get dirt on Clinton?
I never said one way or the other whether or not I thought he was. I said we didn't know, which is pretty obviously true.
[Reply]
Donger 04:11 PM 06-03-2020
Originally Posted by MagicHef:
I never said one way or the other whether or not I thought he was. I said we didn't know, which is pretty obviously true.
I don't think that's pretty obviously true at all. Why did he specifically mention the email dirt to Downer?
[Reply]
MagicHef 04:16 PM 06-03-2020
Originally Posted by Donger:
I don't think that's pretty obviously true at all. Why did he specifically mention the email dirt to Downer?
I don't know. There are myriad possibilities.
[Reply]
Just Passin' By 04:28 PM 06-03-2020
Having not verified the original tweet on the subject, I don't know if Durbin is lying here or not, but it's an odd exchange, so I thought I'd put it here


Props to Rosenstein, though, for not falling for Durbin's schtick here. https://t.co/tVAk1SzGTv

— Mollie (@MZHemingway) June 3, 2020

[Reply]
Donger 04:29 PM 06-03-2020
Originally Posted by MagicHef:
I don't know. There are myriad possibilities.
Sure. And he didn't mention anything else. Odd, eh?

But I will grant you that it isn't as cut and dry as Lyin' Junior. But it was the reason that the FBI opened their counterintelligence investigation.

Agreed?
[Reply]
MagicHef 04:41 PM 06-03-2020
Originally Posted by Donger:
Sure. And he didn't mention anything else. Odd, eh?

But I will grant you that it isn't as cut and dry as Lyin' Junior. But it was the reason that the FBI opened their counterintelligence investigation.

Agreed?
He didnít mention anything else? Do you have a link to back that up?
[Reply]
Just Passin' By 07:19 PM 06-03-2020

WATCH: ⁦@RodRosenstein⁩ responds to former Deputy FBI Director McCabe claim his “testimony is completely at odds with the factual record.” @LindseyGrahamSC wants McCabe to testify about when he knew in 2017 the Steele dossier sources fell apart. ⁦@CBSNewspic.twitter.com/4lJqWlXqEg

— Catherine Herridge (@CBS_Herridge) June 4, 2020

[Reply]
Merde Furieux 08:28 AM 06-04-2020
So who's gonna hang for this?
[Reply]
MagicHef 04:16 PM 06-04-2020
Originally Posted by Donger:
Sure. And he didn't mention anything else. Odd, eh?

But I will grant you that it isn't as cut and dry as Lyin' Junior. But it was the reason that the FBI opened their counterintelligence investigation.

Agreed?
Originally Posted by MagicHef:
He didnít mention anything else? Do you have a link to back that up?
I'm guessing this means you don't have a link to back up your claim?
[Reply]
Donger 04:49 PM 06-04-2020
Originally Posted by MagicHef:
I'm guessing this means you don't have a link to back up your claim?
Nothing else of consequence, no.
[Reply]
MagicHef 05:05 PM 06-04-2020
Originally Posted by Donger:
Nothing else of consequence, no.
Link?
[Reply]
Donger 05:05 PM 06-04-2020
Originally Posted by MagicHef:
Link?
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-05-...speak/11107712
[Reply]
MagicHef 05:12 PM 06-04-2020
Originally Posted by Donger:
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-05-...speak/11107712
Your link does not support your claim. In fact, it refutes it.
[Reply]
Page 10 of 11
« First < 678910 11 >
Up