Today at 3:00, Steve will be holding a press conference regarding the criminal investigation involving Tyreek Hill and Crystal Espinal. This will be held in our 4th floor conference room.
Originally Posted by Marcellus: :-) I'll keep telling myself I can ****ing read.
I'm not saying the NFL doesn't have some type of evidence, all i am saying is Goodall cannot, I repeat cannot, just willy nilly suspend players without some sort of evidence.
The investigation of Hill is probably evidence enough for something. [Reply]
The NFL and the Chiefs should leave Tyreek Hill alone and make the point that the best interests of the child is for the parents to get help if they need help and not try to create an environment where people are afraid to make good faith reports and participate in the child protection process.
The NFL and the Chiefs should not create a situation where they attempt to breach the confidentiality of the child protection process. If these young parents or one of them needs some help, let the professionals help them and don't meddle with that process. [Reply]
Originally Posted by BryanBusby: :-) he can change that however he sees fit. They gave him sole ownership of the entire system and all that stuff is just stuff he can simply ignore if he feels like it.
That is the NFL's written personal conduct policy.That actually means something. It implicitly states repeatedly "evidence" of a violation occurring.
Maybe they have evidence but they cant do shit without proof. You guys are nuts. [Reply]
Originally Posted by MightyMouse:
I can’t believe there are people that believe he won’t be suspended. They have to either be trolling or just watch chiefs game and don’t follow the NFL
He will be suspended. 6-8 games seems likely. A year isn’t even impossible.
The only question is how long is the suspension/when it gets announced and how to proceed. Appeal and drag it out it until 2020 seems likely
As far the press conference goes. The DA is saving face with his comments. His words literally mean nothing. It’s PR 101.
Suspended for what? Maybe being the one out of who knows how many people that might have done something that no charges were filed for? [Reply]
Originally Posted by jd1020:
Do you not believe that the case in which Hill is involved in wouldnt fall under the last two bullet points under "Standard of Conduct"?
Originally Posted by TwistedChief:
If he didn't beat his pregnant girlfriend, he probably would've been my favorite player in professional sports.
This isn't the time or place, Mr. TwistedChief, but we should perhaps discuss that particular case in depth.
There are fascinating aspects of those events (and the events that followed) which raise questions about what happened, why, and how the case was handled by all concerned.
The only way and I repeat the ONLY way Hill gets a suspension is if he refuses to cooperate with the NFL. Hill is not getting suspended because Brooke Pryor was looking for a scoop. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Marcellus:
That is the NFL's written personal conduct policy.That actually means something. It implicitly states repeatedly "evidence" of a violation occurring.
Maybe they have evidence but they cant do shit without proof. You guys are nuts.
He has zero obligation to follow anything he directed to be written. He can bend the rules as he sees fit because the Collective Bargaining Agreement gave him the power to do so.
He's gone against his own policy many times in the past. Don't assume he's going to follow that fully. It's a kangaroo court basically. [Reply]
