Originally Posted by IowaHawkeyeChief:
To clarify, Donger is on the left... says he's not, but he parrots their talking points every day.
No he doesn't. He seems guided by his convictions, which put him at odds with many Trump Ballwashers whose convictions didn't seem quite as steadfast. [Reply]
Originally Posted by BigBeauford:
No he doesn't. He seems guided by his convictions, which put him at odds with many Trump Ballwashers whose convictions didn't seem quite as steadfast.
Thank you for confirming my original analysis, now go support your open borders and pro China agenda... [Reply]
Originally Posted by BigBeauford:
No he doesn't. He seems guided by his convictions, which put him at odds with many Trump Ballwashers whose convictions didn't seem quite as steadfast.
Donger's defect is psychological, not necessarily policy perspective.
He has a set of ostensibly 'conservative' positions he can rattle off, but when it comes to the machinations of governance and the personnel governing, he's blithely accepting of the left's narrative about how they are forthright professionals and how the right is composed to nihilist scoundrels.
He worships the bureaucratic state, and thinks those who trend left are the only ones worthy of government power, and he retains his 'conservatism by meekly mewling from a position of zero power 'gosh guys, you really shouldn't do that, but I guess you know more than me' when they do exactly what they were elected to do. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Baby Lee:
Donger's defect is psychological, not necessarily policy perspective.
He has a set of ostensibly 'conservative' positions he can rattle off, but when it comes to the machinations of governance and the personnel governing, he's blithely accepting of the left's narrative about how they are forthright professionals and how the right is composed to nihilist scoundrels.
He worships the bureaucratic state, and thinks those who trend left are the only ones worthy of government power, and he retains his 'conservatism by meekly mewling from a position of zero power 'gosh guys, you really shouldn't do that, but I guess you know more than me' when they do exactly what they were elected to do.
Originally Posted by Baby Lee:
he's blithely accepting of the left's narrative about how they are forthright professionals and how the right is composed to nihilist scoundrels.
Unfortunately freedom doesn't really offer gulags or some other forced way of getting your brain unwashed but I still hold out hope once the tyranny you support hits, you might have one eye partially opened. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Baby Lee:
Donger's defect is psychological, not necessarily policy perspective.
He has a set of ostensibly 'conservative' positions he can rattle off, but when it comes to the machinations of governance and the personnel governing, he's blithely accepting of the left's narrative about how they are forthright professionals and how the right is composed to nihilist scoundrels.
He worships the bureaucratic state, and thinks those who trend left are the only ones worthy of government power, and he retains his 'conservatism by meekly mewling from a position of zero power 'gosh guys, you really shouldn't do that, but I guess you know more than me' when they do exactly what they were elected to do.
Really, that's what I call European-style ( including British) conservatism. It's different than the American version. You'd at least think, he'd be better since some of our ideas on authorities or rising up against Establishment, stems from movements in England. They have some history of resisting the total rule of kings. Then again, they got a tyrant like Boris Johnson governing them now. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Imon Yourside:
Unfortunately freedom doesn't really offer gulags or some other forced way of getting your brain unwashed but I still hold out hope once the tyranny you support hits, you might have one eye partially opened.
What tyranny do you think I support? Please be specific. [Reply]