Originally Posted by : Missouri AG moves to dismiss charges against couple who pointed guns at crowd
...Within hours of the ruling, Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt filed a brief seeking to dismiss Gardner’s charges against the McCloskeys on the grounds that their Second Amendment rights are being violated.
“The right to keep and bear arms is given the highest level of protection in our constitution and our laws, including the Castle Doctrine, which provides broad rights to Missourians who are protecting their property and lives from those who wish to do them harm,” Schmitt said in a prepared statement provided to Fox News.
“Despite this, Circuit Attorney Gardner filed suit against the McCloskeys, who, according to published reports, were defending their property and safety. As Missouri’s Chief law enforcement officer, I won’t stand by while Missouri law is being ignored,” Schmitt said.
The brief filing says the attorney general “respectfully requests that the Court dismiss this case at the earlier possible opportunity.” ...
If charged with anything, it should be mandatory gun safety class for both.
But my guess is they were a little freaked out by a crowd of people, some (not all, SOME) of whom may have had nefarious motives. The wife was scared out of her mind obviously. Her hand was shaking pretty bad. I'm just glad she didn't accidentally shoot herself. Or her husband.
In all honesty, I would have reacted pretty harshly to a group of people who came through the neighborhood like that. . [Reply]
Originally Posted by vailpass:
Your move, Circuit Attorney Gardner. How far are you willing to abdicate your duties to pursue your politics?
If she’s not all into this, this might not be the movement for her. She needs to remove the doubt from any bodies mind and show everybody she is 100% into this. Speaking of 100% last I heard that is the turnover ratio of employees in her office. [Reply]
Originally Posted by WilliamTheIrish:
If charged with anything, it should be mandatory gun safety class for both.
But my guess is they were a little freaked out by a crowd of people, some (not all, SOME) of whom may have had nefarious motives. The wife was scared out of her mind obviously. Her hand was shaking pretty bad. I'm just glad she didn't accidentally shoot herself. Or her husband.
In all honesty, I would have reacted pretty harshly to a group of people who came through the neighborhood like that. .
Guess they’re in the muzzle control is overrated crowd. I couldn’t figure out who was worse him or her. They spent more time pointing their weapons at each other than they did the trespassers. [Reply]
Originally Posted by WilliamTheIrish:
If charged with anything, it should be mandatory gun safety class for both.
But my guess is they were a little freaked out by a crowd of people, some (not all, SOME) of whom may have had nefarious motives. The wife was scared out of her mind obviously. Her hand was shaking pretty bad. I'm just glad she didn't accidentally shoot herself. Or her husband.
In all honesty, I would have reacted pretty harshly to a group of people who came through the neighborhood like that. .
I can see it now. WTI out in his front yard with a bucket of golf balls and a driving iron.
" ONE MORE GOD DAM STEP TOWARDS MY PROPERTY AND ILL START BOUNCING THESE BALLS OFF YOUR FUCKING FOREHEADS" [Reply]
Originally Posted by LiveSteam:
I can see it now. WTI out in his front yard with a bucket of golf balls and a driving iron.
" ONE MORE GOD DAM STEP TOWARDS MY PROPERTY AND ILL START BOUNCING THESE BALLS OFF YOUR ****ING FOREHEADS"
Not much chance of that. I'd end up slicing one through my own car window.
I'd be better off with my Mossberg. Nice wide pattern.
But I'd have probably stayed inside. With the safety on. Ready but nervous.I don't want to kill anybody by way of an accident. [Reply]
