Clark was tired all season long of saying how our defense sucked and how he didn’t live up to expectations for the trade. I say he exceeded expectations and is a vital reason why we are in super bowl 54. Veach won this trade. It’s time to talk about how Brett Veach just may be the best GM in all of football even though he’s the youngest GM in the game [Reply]
I’m not saying Houston and Berry didn’t get hyped up from time to time. But, Frank and HB have a visceral hate for their opponents, and act like they wish they could legally kill them. THAT’S the kind of attitude we’ve been needing on D. [Reply]
Originally Posted by dirk digler:
No doubt and IIRC one of the reason why the Chiefs traded for Clark is because they thought they needed the attitude/alpha dog
Probably very little difference in Ford vs Clark quite honestly. Huge difference.in coverage and pass defense scheme skills with Matthieu. Its mainly a difference in dcoordinator. Sutton was really that bad. I don't ever buy the personality and alpha dog crap though. Its mainly a fallacy fans like to latch onto. They think extroverts are better at football than introverts. It really doesn't matter either way. [Reply]
Originally Posted by BWillie:
Probably very little difference in Ford vs Clark quite honestly. Huge difference.in coverage and pass defense scheme skills with Matthieu. Its mainly a difference in dcoordinator. Sutton was really that bad.
*beats head against the wall*
DEE FORD IS A SACK OF SHIT IN THE RUN DEFENSE.
FRANK CLARK DOESN'T LINE UP OFFSIDES.
THATS THE DIFFERENCE.
SINCE YOU DONT NOTICE THE RUN GAME, OR RECOGNIZE ITS IMPACT, IT MAKES SENSE THAT YOU THINK THAT BROKEDICK ****STICK DEE FORD IS ANYWHERE CLOSE TO THE SAME CALIBER OF PLAYER THAT CLARK IS...****ING BUDDHA WEEPS. [Reply]