Originally Posted by Raiderhader:
There is an answer but, it would result in a fairly quick move to DC and I am not going to be that guy.
You mean like how the media has been bought off into a only a handful of mega conglomerates? They are deliberately dumbing down the news so people tune it out..and distribute the same homogenous narrative to 25 markets simultaneously? That while appearing to be about social justice...it's actually deliberately designed to divide and conquer and keep the pleebs arguing amongst themselves about trivial shit while they pillage resources and consolidate power? It's part of a coordinated conspiracy to slowly reprogram the masses into docile creatures that suddenly find themselves in poverty?
They save that for VIPs, not some unknown beat reporter for a failing newspaper who tried to ruin a man's life with no evidence just to get a few clicks.
I worked my entire life and (considering my corporeality as a fully-sworn, inveterate heathen) held myself almost entirely sinless and unsullied throughout, sir, in order that I might post on this site without fear of reproval or reprimand.
Imagine being so fragile that you tried to destroy an innocent man’s career, all because you’re insecure about being a sloppy fat turd that men don’t have interest in. pic.twitter.com/FJV4u5fkC2
Brooke should avoid discussing any areas where she's vulnerable to criticism, which would include food, the Chiefs, social issues, men, and black people. I would advise that she limit her writing going forward to discussions of the white women on the women's soccer team. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Rain Man:
Brooke should avoid discussing any areas where she's vulnerable to criticism, which would include food, the Chiefs, social issues, men, and black people. I would advise that she limit her writing going forward to discussions of the white women on the women's soccer team at a liberal college town's rag of a newspaper.
