ITT: people saying snow on the ground proves global warming ain't real!
[Reply]

Yip.

In 1980 there were 410,000,000+ registered motor vehicles globally.
In 2016 there were 1,322,000,000+ registered motor vehicles globally.

Your opinion is that the emissions by 410,000,000+ vehicles have the same effect that 1,322,000,000+ vehicles have?

Can you please elaborate on why you hold this opinion?
[Reply]

I wouldn’t be surprised if 10 newer cars put out less emissions than 1 from 1980.


I am only guessing though.
[Reply]

From the EPA, CO2 has only gone up 18% in the US from vehicles in that time.

https://www.epa.gov/transportation-a...transportation

And that is double the number of cars
[Reply]

That is about my view. I've never liked the idea of life insurance - that someone profits off of my death. Don't think I could ever trust someone that much.

As far as inheritance. You don't owe anybody anything. Use it all up before you die. Don't understand the people who work until they are 75, die with millions to their name.

But of course - I don't have kids so that is easy for me to say.
[Reply]

Sometimes the stupidity around here amazes me but then again my own brother is an idiot when it comes to this stuff so I'll just blame Fox News and bounce, shaking my head.

Meanwhile a Russian city is overrun with polar bears because of the ice breaking up.
[Reply]

They just grow up to be people, and people are assholes. So, no.
[Reply]

Some of them grow up to be strippers and do porn. It’s not all bad.
[Reply]

[Reply]

In North Dakota, we once had a climate that resulted in coal, as in a warm climate, huge vegetative growth, swamps, etc. And we once had a climate where we had a 1-2 mile thickness of ice on the land. Now that’s climate change!
[Reply]

Because there's never been polar bears in Russia before...

You guys here make fun of anybody that thinks the earth isn't 5 billion years old but then you believe that 180 years of weather data, out of that FIVE BILLION YEARS, is a relevant statistical sample.

Maybe, I don't know, stick to science instead of government funded propaganda.
[Reply]

Sticking to science, that's the way one denies climate change. Okay, genius.
[Reply]

Typical response. Not interested in debate, interested in imposing your view on everyone else. Sound familiar?
[Reply]

yeah I'm not interested in debating climate change. There's no debate. One side is right, the other side clings to nonsense for monetary selfishness.
[Reply]

I'm glad you've seen the error of your ways.
[Reply]