OK!
[Reply]

WOW THANKS FOR THE INFO
[Reply]

How exciting
[Reply]

Great.... Something else they can fuck up
[Reply]

dont worry, I will link it.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.ac5ec925bf10
[Reply]

OMG!
[Reply]

This will matter. Mahomes gonna be lighting up the scoreboard, so we'll see a lot of "questionable" in bounds catches.
[Reply]

"And we’ll go back to the old replay standard of reverse the call on the field only when it’s indisputable.”


Shouldn't this have always been the threshold to reverse?
[Reply]

That's been my biggest complaint since they started all this review bullshit. If it's absolutely clear the call on the field was wrong, change it. If not, move on.

I kind of wish that refs weren't even allowed to see calls in slow mo. Just give them 30 seconds to watch a couple replays at full speed and move on.
[Reply]

How about they just make sure the refs understand what the rules are instead of constantly tweaking them?
[Reply]

"committee members plan to propose getting rid of portions of the rule related to a receiver going to the ground while making a catch and to slight movement of the football while it’s in the receiver’s hands. "


Thank goodness
[Reply]

Neat!
[Reply]

meanwhile, the refs - apparently - still have no idea what is/is not Forward Progress.
[Reply]

ALL CAPS!!!!!!!!!!!
[Reply]