ChiefsPlanet Mobile
View Poll Results: What does Foles net us?
I am really confident it'll be a 3rd. 0 0%
I think it'll be a 3rd. 2 5.71%
I am really confident it'll be a 4th. 2 5.71%
I think it'll be a 4th. 13 37.14%
I am really confident it'll be a 5th. 2 5.71%
I think it'll be a 5th. 11 31.43%
I am really confident it'll be a 6th. 3 8.57%
I think it'll be a 6th. 2 5.71%
I actually thought those Crocodile Dundee commercials were going to be a real movie. Kind of disappointed. 0 0%
I actually thought those Crocodile Dundee commercials were going to be a real movie. Thank god. 1 2.86%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 35. You may not vote on this poll
Page 1 of 3
1 23 >
Saccopoo Memorial Draft Forum>We're all idiots, but let's talk Nick Foles compensatory pick.
Direckshun 01:57 PM 02-05-2018
I have a repository of the picks the Chiefs probably have that I'll now have to update.

We traded for Fuller and an additional 3rd.

Secondly, the Foles pick, once projected as a 6th (or a 5th with meaningful playing time) by Over the Cap, now may be worth as much as a 3rd.

Bullet to your head, how much do you think Foles nets us?
[Reply]
bigjosh 01:58 PM 02-05-2018
Fifth. No way its upgraded to a third
[Reply]
Quesadilla Joe 02:24 PM 02-05-2018
If the Packers are only expected to get a 5th for J.C. Tretter, a guy who played 100% of the snaps and makes around $5.5M per year, I have hard time imagining Foles, with his 800 fewer snaps and $5.5M dollar salary, netting a larger comp pick.
[Reply]
TambaBerry 02:48 PM 02-05-2018
i think a 4th
[Reply]
pugsnotdrugs19 04:35 PM 02-05-2018
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
If the Packers are only expected to get a 5th for J.C. Tretter, a guy who played 100% of the snaps and makes around $5.5M per year, I have hard time imagining Foles, with his 800 fewer snaps and $5.5M dollar salary, netting a larger comp pick.
J.C. Tretter wasn't the SB MVP..
[Reply]
Quesadilla Joe 04:45 PM 02-05-2018
Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19:
J.C. Tretter wasn't the SB MVP..
Is that enough to make up for Foles' 800 fewer snaps?
[Reply]
TambaBerry 05:20 PM 02-05-2018
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
Is that enough to make up for Foles' 800 fewer snaps?
Seeing how that's by far the ultimate goal for any player ever yes yes it should be
[Reply]
kccrow 07:40 PM 02-05-2018
5th. He was a bubble guy at 5 v 6. It's probably going to be a 5th now. That's' as far as that wheel rolls.
[Reply]
New World Order 08:06 PM 02-05-2018
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
If the Packers are only expected to get a 5th for J.C. Tretter, a guy who played 100% of the snaps and makes around $5.5M per year, I have hard time imagining Foles, with his 800 fewer snaps and $5.5M dollar salary, netting a larger comp pick.
What would the Browns be without JC Tretter?

What would the Eagles be without Nick Foles?
[Reply]
DaneMcCloud 08:17 PM 02-05-2018
The Chiefs received 4 Comp Picks in 2017 for Jeff Allen, Donald Stephenson, Tyvon Branch and Sean Smith.

A 3rd, 5th and two 6th's.

Surely, Foles is worth at least a 4th.
[Reply]
Quesadilla Joe 08:19 PM 02-05-2018
Originally Posted by New World Order:
What would the Browns be without JC Tretter?

What would the Eagles be without Nick Foles?
It's a formula, it doesn't care what position you play.

As far as I know it mostly cares about how many players a team signed/lost, how much $ those players signed for, and how many snaps they played.
[Reply]
DaneMcCloud 08:22 PM 02-05-2018
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
Is that enough to make up for Foles' 800 fewer snaps?
Hey Buttfuck, you're only referring to the Regular Season, which included an absolutely meaningless Week 17 game.

Foles appeared in 3 Post Season games, including the Super Bowl, so add at least another 210 snap counts to that total.

Also, try using your own brain for once instead parrotting all of the Bronco homers you blow every day.
[Reply]
BryanBusby 08:22 PM 02-05-2018
You have no idea exactly how the formula is weighted, you dingus. Some guy on twitter has no idea how to break down a method that escapes people that work for teams.

Fuck off already
[Reply]
DaneMcCloud 08:24 PM 02-05-2018
Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
It's a formula, it doesn't care what position you play.
:-)

Originally Posted by Quesadilla Joe:
As far as I know it mostly cares about how many players a team signed/lost, how much $ those players signed for, and how many snaps they played.
You don't know dick and you clearly don't know how many snap Foles played in 7 games this season.

Sit down and shut the fuck up.
[Reply]
Quesadilla Joe 08:30 PM 02-05-2018
Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud:
Hey Butt****, you're only referring to the Regular Season, which included an absolutely meaningless Week 17 game.

Foles appeared in 3 Post Season games, including the Super Bowl, so add at least another 210 snap counts to that total.

Also, try using your own brain for once instead parrotting all of the Bronco homers you blow every day.
Hey buttfuck, I'm not. Check it out for yourself you buttfucking moron...

http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/snapcounts

SB 52 is the ONLY game missing from their snap count data, so add another 60-70 snaps to Foles' 212 snaps
[Reply]
Page 1 of 3
1 23 >
Up