ChiefsPlanet Mobile
Page 8 of 318
« First < 45678 91011121858108 > Last »
Washington DC and The Holy Land>Guilty! Now for the Trial - Donald Trump Impeachment Show Trial Thread
Taco John 11:11 PM 11-12-2019

[Reply]
Taco John 11:30 AM 11-13-2019
Originally Posted by Donger:
So you are saying that Obama, the Brits, Germans, EU and the IMF all wanted to protect Hunter?

Have you considered that if that is the case, Joe's threat is amazingly obvious?
Yes and yes.
[Reply]
Marcellus 11:31 AM 11-13-2019
Originally Posted by banyon:
*Groan*

It's not 2nd hand or 3rd hand.

https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/pol...tZJ/story.html
"anti corruption statement".
[Reply]
Trolly McTrollson 11:31 AM 11-13-2019
Wow Nunes is on fire today.
[Reply]
Donger 11:31 AM 11-13-2019
Originally Posted by ChiTown:
Of course this was a quid pro quo.
I remember when this all broke and Trumpers repeated Trump's declaration of "NO QUID PRO QUO!"

Good times.
[Reply]
petegz28 11:32 AM 11-13-2019
So here is what you have in a nutshell...

WB contacts Schiff
Schiff lies about it
Schiff starts "inquiry"
Schiff lies about the President's transcript in his opening statement of a hearing (very, very unethical)
Schiff holds closed door meetings to vet the witnesses he wants to call later
Schiff calls said vetted witnesses in open hearings
Schiff dictats what witnesses and questions the R's can call and ask


And you say Trump is hiding or lying about something???

:-)

Schiff is the same guy that stepped all over himself and lied about several things during the failed Russia witch hunt.

Magically he is right in the middle of this now.

He should have recused himself from the off since he lied about not having any contact with the WB.
[Reply]
ChiTown 11:32 AM 11-13-2019
Originally Posted by Donger:
I remember when this all broke and Trumpers repeated Trump's declaration of "NO QUID PRO QUO!"

Good times.
Wait, are you including me in that statement?
[Reply]
Donger 11:32 AM 11-13-2019
Originally Posted by Taco John:
Yes and yes.
:-)

Of course. An 9/11 was an inside job. Pizza!
[Reply]
Donger 11:32 AM 11-13-2019
Originally Posted by ChiTown:
Wait, are you including me in that statement?
No.
[Reply]
banyon 11:32 AM 11-13-2019
Originally Posted by Marcellus:
That kind of personal gain is apparently OK Pete. They are not concerned about it in the least, obviously.

And they wonder why we find their outrage to be such nonsense. Its selective outrage because Orange Man Bad!!!
Ok, let's see how long ago I stated this (and have stated it many,many times since:

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showp...&postcount=139

Oh September f*king 30. Ok.

What else were you wanting me to do about it? start a march or something?
[Reply]
Donger 11:33 AM 11-13-2019
Originally Posted by petegz28:
So here is what you have in a nutshell...

WB contacts Schiff
Schiff lies about it
Schiff starts "inquiry"
Schiff lies about the President's transcript in his opening statement of a hearing (very, very unethical)
Schiff holds closed door meetings to vet the witnesses he wants to call later
Schiff calls said vetted witnesses in open hearings
Schiff dictats what witnesses and questions the R's can call and ask


And you say Trump is hiding or lying about something???

:-)

Schiff is the same guy that stepped all over himself and lied about several things during the failed Russia witch hunt.

Magically he is right in the middle of this now.

He should have recused himself from the off since he lied about not having any contact with the WB.
Wow, a fail right off the bat. Nice work, pete.
[Reply]
Marcellus 11:34 AM 11-13-2019
Originally Posted by Marcellus:
"anti corruption statement".
This is not evidence of extortion, and Trump did not tell him that, Sondland did and he has stated he doesn't know Trump's motive.

Originally Posted by banyon:
You don't get to tie your demand to monetary extortion.

[Reply]
banyon 11:34 AM 11-13-2019
Originally Posted by Marcellus:
"anti corruption statement".
Am I really now going to have to walk you through the other context where Giuliani revises the statement multiple times to clarify that a generic statement was insufficient and that other individuals knew when they were talking about corruption, they meant Biden and Burisma?

At some point you are going to need to be able to keep more than 1 piece of evidence in your head at the same time.
[Reply]
Donger 11:35 AM 11-13-2019
Originally Posted by Marcellus:
This is not evidence of extortion, and Trump did not tell him that, Sondland did and he has stated he doesn't know Trump's motive.
Want to make a bet that Sondland eventually ends up saying that Trump told him exactly that?
[Reply]
Marcellus 11:36 AM 11-13-2019
Originally Posted by banyon:
Ok, let's see how long ago I stated this (and have stated it many,many times since:

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showp...&postcount=139

Oh September f*king 30. Ok.

What else were you wanting me to do about it? start a march or something?
This is going to sting a little, so be prepared.

If you think Biden's actions deserve investigation then you have no quarrel with Trump here. The investigation being justified means if Trump benefits politically that's just a fortune outcome and smart politics.

Its really just that simple.
[Reply]
Marcellus 11:37 AM 11-13-2019
Originally Posted by Donger:
Want to make a bet that Sondland eventually ends up saying that Trump told him exactly that?
So Sondland lied before?
[Reply]
Page 8 of 318
« First < 45678 91011121858108 > Last »
Up