Originally Posted by New World Order:
We were already right there with a first year starting quarterback and one of the worst defenses of all-time last year.
Both are better this year.
Our defense is also better. Might be the best since 03.
Offensively Gordon and Brown need to stay on the field. [Reply]
Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19:
The Miami Herald guy said Minkah is down to either KC or Seattle.
I think it’s the best course of action. He’s a baller and a foundational piece that won’t be a shithead.
I don't think Fitzpatrick is putting this team over the top today. If that's the move they make, I'd certainly understand why, but I think you want someone that can go balls out outside to get you to where you expect to go right now. [Reply]
Originally Posted by St. Patty's Fire:
The Chiefs will beat the Patriots this season with or without Ramsey. It’s just the diffetence between a 3 point margin of victory and a 14 point one.
Originally Posted by BryanBusby:
I don't think Fitzpatrick is putting this team over the top today. If that's the move they make, I'd certainly understand why, but I think you want someone that can go balls out outside to get you to where you expect to go right now.
I can see that logic IF they don’t believe in Minkah or Fuller as an outside corner.
But I assume they do or they wouldn’t be talking about a trade with MIA. [Reply]
Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19:
I don’t believe that at all. The kid just graded out as Miami’s top PFF player yesterday, FWIW. He’s no bust.
It’s a 1 IMO considering where we will pick.
Sure, I think that compensation is ridiculous, but Marty called KC and Seattle as the final 2 bidders quite a while ago. He may very well have something on this one. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Detoxing:
The Pats signed AB so they could try and keep up with the Chiefs scoring prowess.
Lets counter that move with a Ramsey trade.
Checkmate.
As much as I hate the idea of trading a 1st for a one year deal. I believe we could recoup with a tag and trade. Of course that would certainly be the end of Jones in the red and yellow. [Reply]
Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19:
I can see that logic IF they don’t believe in Minkah or Fuller as an outside corner.
But I assume they do or they wouldn’t be talking about a trade with MIA.
They talked on Fuller like they didn't seem confident about him playing outside at all, which I thought was a little odd. Maybe they have confidence in Fitz doing it? Who knows [Reply]
Originally Posted by J Diddy:
As much as I hate the idea of trading a 1st for a one year deal. I believe we could recoup with a tag and trade. Of course that would certainly be the end of Jones in the red and yellow.
New CBA looming....who knows what that cap may look like... [Reply]
I can't believe how much some of you cling to the idea of not wanting to give up what is essentially a high 2nd rounder for certain players....QUIT OVERVALUING DRAFT PICKS. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Jerm:
I can't believe how much some of you cling to the idea of not wanting to give up what is essentially a high 2nd rounder for certain players....QUIT OVERVALUING DRAFT PICKS.
That SF 2nd might not be as hot of a ticket as we thought either. [Reply]
