I would love to have a chance to hear the whole recording, not just a couple of outtakes. You know, some context before making any conclusions. It might be interesting to have the tape itself checked by the police, I am curious how much editing may have occurred in the first place. And maybe some understanding of why this was sent to the press, not child services or the DA. That is fucked up even while it does not change the contents.
Don't get me wrong. Tyreek (and Crystal) need some serious parental counselling and teaching. And the son (and maybe the expected twins) should not be around either one of them for a while yet. Certainly not the first young couple to need to learn better examples than what they learned growing up.
Honestly I am undecided for myself on whether Tyreek should ever play another down. I expect that he is done for the NFL for life just due to optics if nothing else. [Reply]
We still really have no idea what happened. We know he likely grabbed his arm with force. That’s it. He’s a strong guy and it wouldn’t take much force to damage a little kid’s arm. We don’t know if he intended to harm the kid and more likely than not he probably didn’t.
If nothing else comes out, I think you play him (assuming the NFL allows him to play). There’s no video evidence as with Hunt.
If another incident is reported, then cut him immediately. [Reply]
Originally Posted by TwistedChief:
Not that she's a moron for getting abused by him and raising a child with him.
You still sound like a ****ing moron.
The shit was over, he was never named and wasn't charged with shit. Another case of a non black woman saying something against a black.man and it's taken as evidence and fact. It's illegal to tape someone without their knowledge and he didn't admit shit. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Hydrae:
I would love to have a chance to hear the whole recording, not just a couple of outtakes. You know, some context before making any conclusions. It might be interesting to have the tape itself checked by the police, I am curious how much editing may have occurred in the first place. And maybe some understanding of why this was sent to the press, not child services or the DA. That is fucked up even while it does not change the contents.
Don't get me wrong. Tyreek (and Crystal) need some serious parental counselling and teaching. And the son (and maybe the expected twins) should not be around either one of them for a while yet. Certainly not the first young couple to need to learn better examples than what they learned growing up.
Honestly I am undecided for myself on whether Tyreek should ever play another down. I expect that he is done for the NFL for life just due to optics if nothing else.
Originally Posted by bigjosh:
**** tyreek hill. This team is on the verge of a super bowl. Cut his ass they dont need this bullshit distraction all year.
There's always someone that will trade for him... [Reply]
Originally Posted by ARROW2:
The shit was over, he was never named and wasn't charged with shit. Another case of a non black woman saying something against a black.man and it's taken as evidence and fact. It's illegal to tape someone without their knowledge and he didn't admit shit.
Yup, another case of Hispanic-on-Black racism. Epidemic. [Reply]
Get this piece of shit out of town! I don’t care how fast, incredible, talented he is on the field- he should never be allowed to play in the NFL again! Child abusers belong in prison. ✌🏼✌🏼✌🏼✌🏼out Tyreek, you don’t belong in red & yellow. ❤️💛🏈 [Reply]
Originally Posted by ARROW2:
The shit was over, he was never named and wasn't charged with shit. Another case of a non black woman saying something against a black.man and it's taken as evidence and fact. It's illegal to tape someone without their knowledge and he didn't admit shit.
Actually, it's called a "one-party consent" law. As long as she was a party to the conversation then she CAN in fact LEGALLY record the conversation. By the way, she didn't put any words in his mouth on that tape. She also said she "rode" for him. I'm not sure what she said against him to construe this investigation in the first place, so you may need to reexamine the situation. [Reply]
