Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry:
Only if they stay in Missouri or Kansas. If the Royals moved to a new market, the Cardinals would be an easy switch. NFL would be tough to decide on.
If they moved to Kansas of course. Hell why not let them move every 25 years. After Kansas they can play right across the state line in Nebraska and then after that they can move to Northwest Arkansas
They need to be called the Kansas City Chiefs no matter what. Chiefs Kingdom is a region. [Reply]
Depends on where they moved to. Being from Iowa it's a regional thing for me. If they stayed in the Midwest I absolutely would. Move to the coasts, I'd still root for them but don't think they'd be "my team" anymore. How many Browns fans followed the Ravens to Baltimore? [Reply]
Originally Posted by BigBeauford:
If you continue to monetarily support the team after leaving the metro, you're letting them have their cake and eat it.
TLDR: **** no
You always seemed to be more of a Commanders type of guy anyway. Later [Reply]
Originally Posted by kysirsoze:
I honestly mostly would.
Major League Baseball would be completely dead to me if the Royals left the area. If the Chiefs left the area it would be tougher, because I see myself as more of an NFL fan, probably heavily because of fantasy football, and maybe also because it's an exponentially better league with a level playing field. I'd probably try to adopt a team and see if I could get it to stick. [Reply]