I would love that. Also think people are freaking out too much about the OL. Erving, Wylie and to a lesser extent (but still bad) LDT were the main problems.
Reiter isn’t great, but he’s okay. Our OL immediately looked better when Wiz and Rankin started.
Get Wiz back, draft a good prospect in the 4th and go after another Rankin trade from a stupid team. [Reply]
Originally Posted by staylor26:
Man, if Akers were to fall that far, it would be REALLY hard to pass him up.
You’re talking about a guy that’s arguably the most talented RB in a great class.
I'd take Akers in the 3rd in a heartbeat.
Damien Williams has been awesome when healthy but that's the thing: His health. The guy has 1,100 or so yards in SIX NFL seasons and he can't stay healthy for 8 games, let alone, (ugh), 17.
Akers speed and vision would add yet another dimension to this offense. [Reply]
I want to get Claypool the most out of all those picks. I'm no expert but watching him play he looks like what Kelvin Benjamin should have been and I think he'll be the next receiver off the board after Jeudy and Ruggs. I'd be all about flipping Sammy for a 4th then taking Claypool at 32, a falling CB with our second, and Akers with the third if he's still there [Reply]
Originally Posted by staylor26:
Agreed. In Miller’s scenario Logan Wilson is available. I’d take him over Akers, but I don’t see him being available at the end of the 3rd.
Wilson in the 3rd and then McFarland in the 4th. [Reply]
Originally Posted by RunKC:
Jeff Gladney’s 3 cone kinda worries me. 7.26 is terrible for a corner.
He was running it on a torn meniscus that he’s about to have surgery on. His quickness looked more than adequate on tape. Not the least bit concerned. [Reply]