Originally Posted by Bwana:
Once again, don't come in this thread with some kind of political agenda, or you will be shown the door. If you want to go that route, there is a thread about this in DC.
Originally Posted by Dartgod:
People, there is a lot of good information in this thread, let's try to keep the petty bickering to a minimum.
We all have varying opinions about the impact of this, the numbers, etc. We will all never agree with each other. But we can all keep it civil.
Thanks!
Click here for the original OP:
Spoiler!
Apparently the CoronaVirus can survive on a inanimate objects, such as door knobs, for 9 days.
California coronavirus case could be first spread within U.S. community, CDC says
By SOUMYA KARLAMANGLA, JACLYN COSGROVE
FEB. 26, 2020 8:04 PM
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is investigating what could be the first case of novel coronavirus in the United States involving a patient in California who neither recently traveled out of the country nor was in contact with someone who did.
“At this time, the patient’s exposure is unknown. It’s possible this could be an instance of community spread of COVID-19, which would be the first time this has happened in the United States,” the CDC said in a statement. “Community spread means spread of an illness for which the source of infection is unknown. It’s also possible, however, that the patient may have been exposed to a returned traveler who was infected.”
The individual is a resident of Solano County and is receiving medical care in Sacramento County, according to the state Department of Public Health.
The CDC said the “case was detected through the U.S. public health system — picked up by astute clinicians.”
Officials at UC Davis Medical Center expanded on what the federal agency might have meant by that in an email sent Wednesday, as reported by the Davis Enterprise newspaper.
The patient arrived at UC Davis Medical Center from another hospital Feb. 19 and “had already been intubated, was on a ventilator, and given droplet protection orders because of an undiagnosed and suspected viral condition,” according to an email sent by UC Davis officials that was obtained by the Davis Enterprise.
The staff at UC Davis requested COVID-19 testing by the CDC, but because the patient didn’t fit the CDC’s existing criteria for the virus, a test wasn’t immediately administered, according to the email. The CDC then ordered the test Sunday, and results were announced Wednesday. Hospital administrators reportedly said in the email that despite these issues, there has been minimal exposure at the hospital because of safety protocols they have in place.
A UC Davis Health spokesperson declined Wednesday evening to share the email with The Times.
Since Feb. 2, more than 8,400 returning travelers from China have entered California, according to the state health department. They have been advised to self-quarantine for 14 days and limit interactions with others as much as possible, officials said.
“This is a new virus, and while we are still learning about it, there is a lot we already know,” Dr. Sonia Angell, director of the California Department of Public Health, said in a statement. “We have been anticipating the potential for such a case in the U.S., and given our close familial, social and business relationships with China, it is not unexpected that the first case in the U.S. would be in California.”
It is not clear how the person became infected, but public health workers could not identify any contacts with people who had traveled to China or other areas where the virus is widespread. That raises concern that the virus is spreading in the United States, creating a challenge for public health officials, experts say.
“It’s the first signal that we could be having silent transmission in the community,” said Lawrence Gostin, director of the World Health Organization Collaborating Center on National and Global Health Law. “It probably means there are many more cases out there, and it probably means this individual has infected others, and now it’s a race to try to find out who that person has infected.”
On Tuesday, the CDC offered its most serious warning to date that the United States should expect and prepare for the coronavirus to become a more widespread health issue.
“Ultimately, we expect we will see coronavirus spread in this country,” said Nancy Messonnier, director of the CDC’s National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases. “It’s not so much a question of if, but a question of when.”
According to the CDC’s latest count Wednesday morning, 59 U.S. residents have tested positive for the new strain of coronavirus — 42 of whom are repatriated citizens from a Diamond Princess cruise. That number has grown by two since Messonnier’s last count Tuesday, although the CDC was not immediately available to offer details on the additional cases.
More than 82,000 cases of coronavirus have been reported globally, and more than 2,700 people have died, with the majority in mainland China, the epicenter of the outbreak.
But public health leaders have repeatedly reminded residents that the health risk from the novel coronavirus to the general public remains low.
“While COVID-19 has a high transmission rate, it has a low mortality rate,” the state Department of Public Health said in a statement Wednesday. “From the international data we have, of those who have tested positive for COVID-19, approximately 80% do not exhibit symptoms that would require hospitalization. There have been no confirmed deaths related to COVID-19 in the United States to date.”
CDC officials have also warned that although the virus is likely to spread in U.S. communities, the flu still poses a greater risk.
Gostin said the news of potential silent transmission does not eliminate the possibility of containing the virus in the U.S. and preventing an outbreak.
“There are few enough cases that we should at least try,” he said. “Most of us are not optimistic that that will be successful, but we’re still in the position to try.”
Originally Posted by DaFace:
Masks just need to become fashion accessory like a ball cap. I'm more than happy to wear my Chiefs masks around here, but I get why people wouldn't really like wearing the ones that are just black or that were made with flowery scraps of fabric that someone had wearing around the house.
I don't have a problem with masks but to be cynical a lot of reporters are wearing them for the wrong reasons. [Reply]
Originally Posted by DaFace:
I'm sure there's some of that, but there's got to be more to it.
I think the biggest thing that people probably aren't really understanding (or caring about?) is that the mask isn't there to protect the wearer - it's to protect everyone else.
A couple weeks back I walked into the grocery store. The woman in front of me in the vestibule sneezed, covering her mouth with her hand. She then placed that hand directly onto the shopping care she was using and proceeded as if nothing were out of the ordinary.
The mask would have at least HELPED that (though no one is arguing that it's 100% effective).
I can't find the article, but I remember DeWine dropping the mask requirement in Ohio because it was causing problems for employees. People were threatening violence, etc.
I'm sure you read about the security guard that was murdered because he wouldn't allow a customer inside the store unless they wore a mask.
Originally Posted by petegz28:
You are exactly right. So as has been stated the entire time, the mitigation was to slow the run on the hospitals not necessarily minimize the number of people who got the infection.
If we didn't mitigate we would have had the same number of infections but probably more deaths due to lack of resources in the hospitals.
mitigation has slowed the number of infections. its common sense.
It's almost like you aren't reading what people said. Slowed and reduced are two different things. As every fucking expert has said flattening the curve does not necessarily reduce the number of cases but strings them out. Of course there is a possibility of reduction but no one is saying that was the primary reason for it because it wasn't. [Reply]
Originally Posted by BleedingRed:
Don't bother he lives in a fantasy land where it will just go away if the ENTIRE world stays inside for 2 weeks. (because that will happen)
Sure I can post it again:
Again, if everyone did stay away from other people, this would very quickly be gone. But, that's not practical or feasible. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Baby Lee:
Love the irony that people are so angry and resentful of the 'stupidity' of others they see in social media, and meanwhile we explained a pandemic response to a populace without taking account of how many and how wide-ranging among them were ignorant of basic calc and trig concepts.
Except that has little to nothing to do with it. Of course the shape of the function doesn’t matter if you apply a constraint such that the area is the same. The question at hand is if that is a valid constraint, which it probably technically isn’t, but it might be close enough to not be significant. Also, trig has nothing to do with it at all. Yes, trig is often combined with pre-calc, but they aren’t really related concepts. [Reply]
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath15:
I can't find the article, but I remember DeWine dropping the mask requirement in Ohio because it was causing problems for employees. People were threatening violence, etc.
I'm sure you read about the security guard that was murdered because he wouldn't allow a customer inside the store unless they wore a mask.
People are selfish and uneducated.
Don't elide that he was murdered in large part because he was rude to someone's woman in a tough part of Flint, MI.
It wasn't a heat of the moment thing, the customer denied entry returned home and the people at said home returned to that store later to smoke the security guard. [Reply]