Originally Posted by PAChiefsGuy:
Lol... Look at the lawyer try and **** with ppls heads instead of calling it what it is.
' You should be terrified of me too bitch' why you think he said that BlackOps? If I had to take a logical guess - he is warning her that the kid fears him for a reason he is still capable of beating the shit out of her so she better watch her mouth.
Such a nice guy. Clearly rehabilitated. Those anger management classes definitelty did the trick!
I think he’s in a toxic relationship with her and he wanted her to shut up.
Originally Posted by ChiefaRoo:
I didn’t hear Hill admit to anything in the audio I heard. She did all of the talking other than the parts where he disagreed and/or told her she better be terrified too.
So "she rode for him with that detective" (paraphrasing) oesn't mean anything?
Originally Posted by jettio:
I am not sure that is true. Unless there is a specific injury that an expert witness testifies could not be an accident beyond a reasonable doubt, you would have to know who?
Do you think the kid said in the forensic interview that he gets punished when he cries in a way that the DA has no idea whodunit?
I do not know how far along the kid is at talking about his experiences, but if there is a forensic interview, I expect he said whodunit on any of the allegations in that audio.
Here's a thought-thing ... based on the audio, the Popo have more specific questions to ask of Damien, Mr. jettio. For example; "Did Daddy ever force you to hold your arms away from your body while he punched you in the chest?" You know, stuff like that ...
More precise, detailed questions could make a big difference in how the interrogation goes.
My only prayer at this point is that CPS doesn't waterboard any longer.
Do the people thinking that Hill hasn't abused his kid believe that his 3 year old son is out to get him when he apparently said "Daddy did it" and "Daddy punches me"?
Originally Posted by ChiefaRoo:
I think he’s in a toxic relationship with her and he wanted her to shut up.
Definitely. Still telling her she should be terrified of him too doesn't sound very good coming from a guy who previously beat the girl up when she was pregnant.
Originally Posted by Superturtle:
He couldn't pinpoint exactly who did it. Because it sounds like they were colluding to be uncooperative, so he dropped charges. Now the case is reopened because they got it on audio.
Originally Posted by jd1020:
Do the people thinking that Hill hasn't abused his kid believe that his 3 year old son is out to get him when he apparently said "Daddy did it" and "Daddy punches me"?
I thought it was his GF saying that, when has the 3 yr old said that?
Originally Posted by PHOG:
I thought it was his GF saying that, when has the 3 yr old said that?
The girlfriend is talking in 3rd person asking him why he says that and she also said that when she was defending Hill against questions brought on by investigators and CPS that they said their son repeatedly told them "Daddy punches me."
To be fair it could also be possible that when Hill is beating his fiance he makes her call him "Daddy."
Originally Posted by FAX:
Here's a thought-thing ... based on the audio, the Popo have more specific questions to ask of Damien, Mr. jettio. For example; "Did Daddy ever force you to hold your arms away from your body while he punched you in the chest?" You know, stuff like that ...
More precise, detailed questions could make a big difference in how the interrogation goes.
My only prayer at this point is that CPS doesn't waterboard any longer.
FAX
Cops would not interview a 3 year old. A person trained in interviewing kids in a non-prompting way interviews a 3 year old. If that has happened, I would think the kid has already described all of that. And that is parenting class level stuff, not destroy Dad's life because he is famous level.
Originally Posted by ChiefaRoo:
Not in my mind. You can take it a number of different ways. It ranges from Moral support to I helped you break the law. There’s no way to tell.
Apparently something was enough for the DA to reopen the case.
Originally Posted by jettio:
Cops would not interview a 3 year old. A person trained in interviewing kids in a non-prompting way interviews a 3 year old. If that has happened, I would think the kid has already described all of that. And that is parenting class level stuff, not destroy Dad's life because he is famous level.
Yes. Of course, they have specialists who are tasked with interviewing the children in these situations.
And you'd be surprised how much information you can get once you fire up the electrodes attached to their immature, little genitals.
Originally Posted by PAChiefsGuy:
Definitely. Still telling her she should be terrified of him too doesn't sound very good coming from a guy who previously beat the girl up when she was pregnant.
I guess the DA could try and make the case he made a “Terroristic threat” to her but then the Defense attorney will ask why she didn’t immediately leave him, why did she support him previously etc.
Also, she is the one who said they boy was terrified a few times to him. It’s reasonable to me he wanted her to simply shut up and end the discussion right there.
Originally Posted by jd1020:
The girlfriend is talking in 3rd person asking him why he says that and she also said that when she was defending Hill against questions brought on by investigators and CPS that they said their son repeatedly told them "Daddy punches me."
To be fair it could also be possible that when Hill is beating his fiance he makes her call him "Daddy."
Or, she could be beating him with a ....oh never mind. :-)
