Originally Posted by el borracho:
I’m not sure going back a grade is the answer.
Letting her fat-ass know there are social repercussions for attempted character assassination is a good place to go...
She might think twice before writing stupid TMZ shit like Hardman made homophobic tweets when he was 14.
She doesn't get to just pretend she didn't do anything...the racist hog-woman needs to be reminded that when you judge by the book...the book judges back. [Reply]
So is she still obese and worthy of ridicule? Or is her shitty ass pathetic excuse for "journalism" still a good enough reason for her ridicule? [Reply]
Originally Posted by BlackOp:
Letting her fat-ass know there are social repercussions for attempted character assassination is a good place to go...
She might think twice before writing stupid TMZ shit like Hardman made homophobic tweets when he was 14.
She doesn't get to just pretend she didn't do anything...the racist hog-woman needs to be reminded that when you judge by the book...the book judges back.
Mac N' Cheese will weep like someone stole her ice cream [Reply]
Originally Posted by BigRedChief:
So is she still obese and worthy of ridicule? Or is her shitty ass pathetic excuse for "journalism" still a good enough reason for her ridicule?
She was hired specifically for social agenda driven articles...she doesn't know shit about football. Ridiculing her over what she was hired to do is pointless...and it isn't journalism.
She needs to get the **** away from the Chiefs...she only been there less than a year and look at all the BS she's already stirred up. She's a mole...
Remember when Mellinger said "I was just following orders"....who's orders is the question.. and when was it decided to use a NFL team as cover to further a social engineering agenda. [Reply]
Originally Posted by BlackOp:
She was hired specifically for social agenda driven articles...she doesn't know shit about football. Ridiculing her over what she was hired to do is pointless...and it isn't journalism.
She needs to get the **** away from the Chiefs...she only been there less than a year and look at all the BS she's already stirred up. She's a mole...
:-) local newspapers are owned by huge corporations. They dont give a shit about "social agendas" all they care about is clicks and views, In other words, in 2019, money. [Reply]
Originally Posted by BigRedChief: :-) local newspapers are owned by huge corporations. They dont give a shit about "social agendas" all they care about is clicks and views, In other words, in 2019, money.
You're wrong...the huge media conglomerates ARE the ones ushering in the social engineering. They invest tons of resources with "think tanks" and focus groups.
The news shapes opinions...and molds thinking and behaviors.
Did all of this fake outrage just begin out of nowhere?...the media created it.
"The art of propaganda is for the person to think they came to their conclusions on their own" - Edward Bernays [Reply]
Ridiculing her will only get her more exposure and probably a raise. It's her job and she did it and got in your minds. Whitlock use to get bonuses based on the amount of complaints the Star got from his writings. [Reply]
Originally Posted by BlackOp:
You're wrong...the huge media conglomerates ARE the ones ushering in the social engineering. The invest tons of resources with "think tanks" and focus groups.
The news shapes opinions...and molds thinking and behaviors.
Did all of this fake outrage just begin out of nowhere?...the media created it.
your "conspiracy" BS is just that. When Brooke's articles dont get clicks or views, she's toast. The internet and capitalism's core issue. No clicks or views, no employment. We as Chief fans actually control her continuing employment. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Marcellus:
If you guys spend all your time fat shaming Brooke rather than attacking the REAL issue which is her job performance then yea the women are going to circle the wagons. You guys are making it look 100% like she is mainly being criticized for her looks which is only going to garner sympathy for her from others in her occupation, her coworkers, her boss etc....
You guys have shifted the narrative.
I agree with this. The way to get at her is criticize her sports takes. Give her as few clicks as possible and dont support the Star in any way shape or form.
I wish the players would give her terse yes or no answers but they are professionals. They have probably had meetings on how to handle the press and focus on a run at the superbowl not being targeted by the press. [Reply]
Originally Posted by srvy:
I agree with this. The way to get at her is criticize her sports takes. Give her as few clicks as possible and dont support the Star in any way shape or form.
I wish the players would give her terse yes or no answers but they are professionals. They have probably had meetings on how to handle the press and focus on a run at the superbowl not being targeted by the press.
Critize her takes? Come on man the players dont control her continued employment, we do, chief fans. We dont click or view. shes unemployed. This isn't complicated. No clicks or views. No money. No employment. [Reply]
Originally Posted by BigRedChief: :-) local newspapers are owned by huge corporations. They dont give a shit about "social agendas" all they care about is clicks and views, In other words, in 2019, money.
Yeah, the ESPN SJW-fest was money-driven, right? [Reply]
BRC is in major denial. Newspapers are exactly what they say they are, a NEWS OUTLET. And as Black op pointed out, it is their job to continuously print the same social drivel over and over again until it becomes accepted drivel. [Reply]
