Well, we've already kind of played a game like this against New Orleans and still won. Fisher played noticably limited with a bad back and Remmers was out. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Superturtle:
Well, we've already kind of played a game like this against New Orleans and still won. Fisher played noticably limited with a bad back and Remmers was out.
Great point. NO is equally tough up front as TB. [Reply]
Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19:
Great point. NO is equally tough up front as TB.
Yep - I trust that they'll come up with a scheme to hide the Fisher absence. It will also greatly improve the scheme if Pat gets back more of his mobility - and I thought he moved reasonably well yesterday. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Superturtle:
Well, we've already kind of played a game like this against New Orleans and still won. Fisher played noticably limited with a bad back and Remmers was out.
Yeah, it's definitely nothing to panic about. Concerning though for sure. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Superturtle:
Well, we've already kind of played a game like this against New Orleans and still won. Fisher played noticably limited with a bad back and Remmers was out.
And the Chiefs had to adjust mid-game with Fisher's absence in that situation.
Now Andy Reid will have two weeks to prepare. [Reply]
If we can somehow get through this next game with a win, this coaching staff deserves a medal for what they have been able to manage out of this line. In many ways they have made chicken salad out of chicken ****. [Reply]
About the only good thing about KC's OL being a MASH unit most of the year is this isn't anything new. They've played about all of their OL in about every combination possible already and have 2 weeks to game plan and minimize his loss. [Reply]
