Originally Posted by Dave Lane:
My brother, who was the Director of one of the big three letter agencies in DC, assured me a couple months ago trump will die in prison. "Think of whatever crap you pulled in your business life and take that times 1,000 and that's what they have on him"
He's a big shot lawyer now that voted for trump in 2016 and a 1% republican worth 100 millionish. It's going to be interesting how much time he does. I'm just here to enjoy the tears and the squealing. I'll get a scotch read a few threads laugh till I get my ab work in, and then move on to something productive, like Skyrim.
Yet you ran away for how long? Did you just admit something? [Reply]
Originally Posted by Dave Lane:
My brother, who was the Director of one of the big three letter agencies in DC, assured me a couple months ago trump will die in prison. "Think of whatever crap you pulled in your business life and take that times 1,000 and that's what they have on him"
He's a big shot lawyer now that voted for trump in 2016 and a 1% republican worth 100 millionish. It's going to be interesting how much time he does. I'm just here to enjoy the tears and the squealing. I'll get a scotch read a few threads laugh till I get my ab work in, and then move on to something productive, like Skyrim.
Originally Posted by eDave:
Trump's future Palm Beach neighbors seek legal action to keep him out
I think this is actually pretty interesting.
Mar-a-Lago used to be a private residence. But back in the 90s he wanted to renovate it into a club/resort. So deals were made with the city and part of the deal was that if it was going to be a resort, and specifically and literally, it could not be a residence. There are even limits on how long people can stay and such.
So, not only is Trump not really allowed to live there as his home after he leaves office, it also means he's been voting illegally since he's listed Mar-a-Lago as his residence even though it is specifically barred from being a residence.
I think the Florida election results need to be overturned based on this fraud. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Dave Lane:
My brother, who was the Director of one of the big three letter agencies in DC, assured me a couple months ago trump will die in prison. "Think of whatever crap you pulled in your business life and take that times 1,000 and that's what they have on him"
He's a big shot lawyer now that voted for trump in 2016 and a 1% republican worth 100 millionish. It's going to be interesting how much time he does. I'm just here to enjoy the tears and the squealing. I'll get a scotch read a few threads laugh till I get my ab work in, and then move on to something productive, like Skyrim.
Navy SEAL copy pasta fan fiction for the TDS afflicted [Reply]
Originally Posted by cosmo20002:
I think this is actually pretty interesting.
Mar-a-Lago used to be a private residence. But back in the 90s he wanted to renovate it into a club/resort. So deals were made with the city and part of the deal was that if it was going to be a resort, and specifically and literally, it could not be a residence. There are even limits on how long people can stay and such.
So, not only is Trump not really allowed to live there as his home after he leaves office, it also means he's been voting illegally since he's listed Mar-a-Lago as his residence even though it is specifically barred from being a residence.
I think the Florida election results need to be overturned based on this fraud.
I get the appeal of the story, but I think it’s only illegal in the sense that it’s a violation of the neighborhood land covenants. I have covenants that came with my property such as that I can’t run a chicken coop on my plot. It creates a cause of action civilly between the neighbors and Trump that they can sue for breach of those covenants.
I do not think, however that the State of Florida with respect to voting residency rules is bound by the results of such a suit. For most states and voting purposes, residency just means where you live more than 180 days out of the year. You don’t have to own any property to meet that definition. Trump could live under a bridge from January to July and meet that definition whether he owned property or not. So, as long as Trump was physically there, which we all know he was every chance he got, I doubt very much that election authorities would see it as a violation. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Dave Lane:
My brother, who was the Director of one of the big three letter agencies in DC, assured me a couple months ago trump will die in prison. "Think of whatever crap you pulled in your business life and take that times 1,000 and that's what they have on him"
He's a big shot lawyer now that voted for trump in 2016 and a 1% republican worth 100 millionish. It's going to be interesting how much time he does. I'm just here to enjoy the tears and the squealing. I'll get a scotch read a few threads laugh till I get my ab work in, and then move on to something productive, like Skyrim.
I think Trump would manage to stall it out on stays and appeals until his health failed is my best guess. I mean just look how long he’s dragged on his tax case. [Reply]
Originally Posted by BucEyedPea:
Just what are you doing then?
I do that to you because you alter my words to worsen them repeatedly and make strawman points. That's not communication. It's dishonesty. For someone who claims to be using superior logic, your use of the strawman is just as much a logical fallacy. Ironic how your own superiority complex is protesting condescension. Can't make it up!
I can debunk your points but you endlessly argue to the point of a dead horse and stalk from thread to thread. I can't be bothered with being tied down to one poster with walls of text—and from lying scum media sources no less and who uses dishonesty. I prefer to choose my battles.
And there is no such thing as "fake ignore" since quotes can be seen. And I can ignore at will for periods of time and then not ignore as much as I want. But you being a socialist prog, think you know how best someone should use a feature even if they don't use it formally.
Yes, as I said, understandably my presence bothers you greatly, evidenced by your continual need to delegitimize my right to even post here, and I’ve correctly stated why. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Dave Lane:
My brother, who was the Director of one of the big three letter agencies in DC, assured me a couple months ago trump will die in prison. "Think of whatever crap you pulled in your business life and take that times 1,000 and that's what they have on him"
He's a big shot lawyer now that voted for trump in 2016 and a 1% republican worth 100 millionish. It's going to be interesting how much time he does. I'm just here to enjoy the tears and the squealing. I'll get a scotch read a few threads laugh till I get my ab work in, and then move on to something productive, like Skyrim.
Can you just go back to posting awesome telescope pictures? [Reply]
Originally Posted by Dave Lane:
My brother, who was the Director of one of the big three letter agencies in DC, assured me a couple months ago trump will die in prison. "Think of whatever crap you pulled in your business life and take that times 1,000 and that's what they have on him"
He's a big shot lawyer now that voted for trump in 2016 and a 1% republican worth 100 millionish. It's going to be interesting how much time he does. I'm just here to enjoy the tears and the squealing. I'll get a scotch read a few threads laugh till I get my ab work in, and then move on to something productive, like Skyrim.
New York Supreme Court Judge Arthur Engoron told the Trump Organization to give James' office all communications involving Ralph Mastromonaco, an engineer who had worked on Trump's Seven Springs estate in Westchester County, outside of New York City. Tuesday's decision is a reversal for Engoron, who in October agreed with the Trump Organization's argument that the documents in question were shielded under attorney-client privilege because Mastromonaco was providing expertise to a company attorney. Engoron now says that a lawyer's involvement is no longer reason enough to shield business documents.
"The mere presence of an attorney on an email chain amongst an organization's employees does not trigger the cloak of attorney-client privilege," he wrote. "Moreover, a client waives the privilege if communications are made in the presence of a third party." [Reply]
