To those of you who keep saying that he didn't admit punching the kid, here it is once again. When she talked about him punching the kid in the chest, he responded, "Okay, so what about you? What you gonna do?"
No denial. No questioning what she was talking about. He said "okay" and shifted the focus to her.
That does not sound like the way an innocent man would respond to an accusation of punching a child. [Reply]
If your the owner do you need this drama, twice now, drafting him and now this shit show.
Reek cant keep out of news, after getting a 2nd chance, an opportunity of a lifetime.
Originally Posted by jettio:
They might as well make it illegal to be black if an eavesdrop tape of what a mom says a 3 year old said is something you lose your job over according to white people.
Apparently investigators heard the same thing from the child too. What racist spin can we put on that? [Reply]
Originally Posted by Mama Hip Rockets:
To those of you who keep saying that he didn't admit punching the kid, here it is once again. When she talked about him punching the kid in the chest, he responded, "Okay, so what about you? What you gonna do?"
No denial. No questioning what she was talking about. He said "okay" and shifted the focus to her.
That does not sound like the way an innocent man would respond to an accusation of punching a child.
Yeah, that, the part where they talk about her lying, and where he says she should be terrified of him.... Just too much, man. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower:
Admitting to whipping a toddler with a belt puts him in Adrian Peterson territory..
My dad along with most of my friends' dads would then be considered "child abusers" which is totally and completely not true. Idk where you were raised but getting whooped with a belt on the rear is nothing out of the norm.
EDIT: now the age is a little concerning. I am not sure if a 3 yr old is warranted a whooping with a belt. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Mama Hip Rockets:
To those of you who keep saying that he didn't admit punching the kid, here it is once again. When she talked about him punching the kid in the chest, he responded, "Okay, so what about you? What you gonna do?"
No denial. No questioning what she was talking about. He said "okay" and shifted the focus to her.
That does not sound like the way an innocent man would respond to an accusation of punching a child.
My thoughts exactly. If my wife ever falsely accused me of that, I wouldn’t let it slide by. I would be livid and correct her immediately. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Mama Hip Rockets:
To those of you who keep saying that he didn't admit punching the kid, here it is once again. When she talked about him punching the kid in the chest, he responded, "Okay, so what about you? What you gonna do?"
No denial. No questioning what she was talking about. He said "okay" and shifted the focus to her.
That does not sound like the way an innocent man would respond to an accusation of punching a child.
She's baiting him and pissing him off on purpose.
He's a hothead and she's distracting him and fucking with his head ON PURPOSE. [Reply]
Originally Posted by Superturtle:
Yeah, that, the part where they talk about her lying, and where he says she should be terrified of him.... Just too much, man.
No way! Innocent til proven guilty!
Oh wait he choked her out while she was pregnant [Reply]
Originally Posted by smithandrew051:
My thoughts exactly. If my wife ever falsely accused me of that, I wouldn’t let it slide by. I would be livid and correct her immediately.
Not defending Hill, but he didn’t know he was being recorded. In private, people aren’t as likely to feel the need to state the obvious (assuming Hill didn’t hit him). That’s probably how the DA viewed it [Reply]