U.S. Issues Two LA Cops have been shot in cold blood - Page 19

Originally Posted by mlyonsd:
That isn't an answer. Where would you deploy the feds? At the hospitals or guarding cops sitting in their vehicles? That's what went on there yesterday.

Are there riots in LA? If not, I see no reason to send in the feds. If LAPD need help, they can call the FBI.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Donger:
Excellent. So the next time Trump blames local leaders for not stopping the violence, you'll acknowledge that he isn't doing what can do, and has done, to stop it.

Perhaps he doesn't want it to stop, eh?

He does. When they refuse federal help not much he can do.

Unless you want actual fascist overreach. Do you want that?
[Reply]

Originally Posted by TLO:
I like how CNN pretends this didn't even happen.

"How do you like your bologna sandwiches? An expert weighs in" Is higher up on the page than this story.

Yep. Top story on the Fox site right now. Nowhere to be seen on CNN front page.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Donger:
Great, so the precedent has been set. And he should be doing so everywhere. He's POTUS after all. This is his America.

No federalism in your bag of principles, I take it.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by patteeu:
Do you think this law should be used by the President to send the feds to homes where a couple is arguing?

I think we both realize that the law's wording of domestic violence isn't referring to wife beaters.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Donger:
Great, so the precedent has been set. And he should be doing so everywhere. He's POTUS after all. This is his America.

No - it is OUR America. I notice that no matter the discussion, you always seem to be on the other side of it. Hell, we could be discussion rain showers and you would want more droughts....

I don't get you at all........
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties:
He does. When they refuse federal help not much he can do.

Unless you want actual fascist overreach. Do you want that?

So in all those places you mentioned, federal help was requested?

But there is. See the above law.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Randallflagg:
[/B]

No - it is OUR America. I notice that no matter the discussion, you always seem to be on the other side of it. Hell, we could be discussion rain showers and you would want more droughts....

I don't get you at all........

Sorry, just using Trump's own words against him.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by patteeu:
No federalism in your bag of principles, I take it.

Pardon?
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Donger:
I think we both realize that the law's wording of domestic violence isn't referring to wife beaters.

I'm impressed at your ability to figure that out.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Donger:
Sorry, just using Trump's own words against him.

It always comes back to criticism of Trump for you.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by patteeu:
I'm impressed at your ability to figure that out.

Glad we're on the same page.

So:

Did you not see this?

So, foolish, but it's within his authority per law.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by patteeu:
It always comes back to criticism of Trump for you.

I can't help that he's POTUS, and says stupid and factually-wrong things.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Donger:
So in all those places you mentioned, federal help was requested?

But there is. See the above law.

This isn't an issue.

BLM are terrorists.

Trump is the law.

Why is this a debate?

What do you want Donger? BLM terrorists gunning down cops, or law?

Pick a side. This fence-sitting, question-asking trolling bullshit is poppycock.

This country needs Trump in office whether you like it or not.

Would you prefer to see Biden shaking hands with Marxists in the oval office?

Pick a side. You can have dead cops or a President who cares about safety and security.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by patteeu:
It always comes back to criticism of Trump for you.

It's like some kind of derangement syndrome.
[Reply]